Feb 17 2013, 11:06 PM
QUOTE(Xanfiore @ Feb 17 2013, 10:03 PM)
Thank you 
E.A? No, I don't. Because there's Commerce. The problem is, I already made my decision on not to take it. That was the decision I've made since last year because the teaching method of last year's Commerce teacher was soooooo hard to understand. Even other students have difficulty understanding it. That is until this year when we got ourselves a good teacher. It was fun. But I still can't understand it. Is it because that I'm merely not interested in it or is it I'm understanding it in the wrong way? Nevertheless, I still stick to that decision. Even though they say that if there's something you're not interested in it, you have to. I wouldn't want to risk it. I mean, it's SPM. The crucial year of all. I'm tingling all over just thinking about it x_x Then there's this teacher willing to teach me thoroughly. She said try sitting for UK1 first. If I do that, then I'll have to face the consequences all to myself depending on how I do.
Well anyway, I'll see first. There're other things to worry about like Accounts. And of course, the addition of 2 subjects. I was wondering the best method to understand something. Like how you're taking E.A. It's almost the same as Commerce right? Correct me if I'm wrong
P.S: I heard from a friend that if we don't sit for a certain paper on that day, it won't affect our SPM results?
Commerce , like E.A , Malay Literature , Geografi , they are all pretty straightforward . No challenging concepts to comprehend , if you compare them to the science subjects . So I guess it has to do with your disinterest towards the subject . If that's the case , then your problem is solved . Don't take it . I wouldn't take a subject that I'm not interested in , unless it's compulsory . E.A? No, I don't. Because there's Commerce. The problem is, I already made my decision on not to take it. That was the decision I've made since last year because the teaching method of last year's Commerce teacher was soooooo hard to understand. Even other students have difficulty understanding it. That is until this year when we got ourselves a good teacher. It was fun. But I still can't understand it. Is it because that I'm merely not interested in it or is it I'm understanding it in the wrong way? Nevertheless, I still stick to that decision. Even though they say that if there's something you're not interested in it, you have to. I wouldn't want to risk it. I mean, it's SPM. The crucial year of all. I'm tingling all over just thinking about it x_x Then there's this teacher willing to teach me thoroughly. She said try sitting for UK1 first. If I do that, then I'll have to face the consequences all to myself depending on how I do.
Well anyway, I'll see first. There're other things to worry about like Accounts. And of course, the addition of 2 subjects. I was wondering the best method to understand something. Like how you're taking E.A. It's almost the same as Commerce right? Correct me if I'm wrong
P.S: I heard from a friend that if we don't sit for a certain paper on that day, it won't affect our SPM results?
Just tell your teacher that you're not interested . Problem solve . This is the year where you'll need to have an aim , a clear direction . It's also a year where you need to get rid of distractions .
E.A is not the same as Commerce . Firstly , Commerce involves a lot of retention of facts . Whereas E.A revolves around rational understanding of human behaviours . Since in economics you assume that humans make decisions rationally , concepts are intuitive . In the exams , you just need to apply what you've learnt in the cases that are presented . Whereas for Commerce , the cases are aids to help you come up with the facts you've memorised . Also , E.A teaches analytic skills ( like science ) where you are required to draw graphs , come up with models , and do some simple calculations .
Yes , you can do that . But in your temporary 'penyataan sijil' , there will be a TH . So you wouldn't want to do that .
Quote
0.0602sec
0.96
7 queries
GZIP Disabled