so for anti light amour vechicle?
Military Thread V8, Ops Daulat
Military Thread V8, Ops Daulat
|
|
Mar 19 2013, 06:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,613 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Sg Long/Serdang |
so for anti light amour vechicle?
|
|
|
Apr 8 2013, 12:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,613 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Sg Long/Serdang |
QUOTE(FlameReaper @ Apr 8 2013, 12:44 PM) The Jernas is also very agile even if it's meant for targets flying as low as 3000m and are almost 7000m away from the launcher. Britain still uses these SAMs till today, although they're looking to replace it within 2020 with a further development of the ASRAAM. one reason i not support SH due so many hidden T&C that not really beneficial TUDM in long runAnd yep, we do need a medium-range SAM to complete the gap. I hope it's not something like "You come and buy our Super Hornets first then only you can get them... lah" |
|
|
Apr 10 2013, 10:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,613 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Sg Long/Serdang |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2013, 06:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,613 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Sg Long/Serdang |
QUOTE(azriel @ Apr 29 2013, 03:59 PM) the last pic shooting so near target? |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0680sec
0.26
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 03:44 AM |