Military Thread V8, Ops Daulat
Military Thread V8, Ops Daulat
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 08:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Same thing also happen in Taiwan |
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
....and also Turkey, Ukraine, Jordan, Thailand, Macedonia, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Venenzuela, Nepal, Nigeria, Mexico, Moldivia, Russia, Surinam, Jordan, Bolivia, ....the list goes on...
|
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 09:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 10:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Air defenses of Pyongyang
The North Korean capital is probably the most heavily defended city on the planet. Satellite image with AAA positions marked by their effective ranges (*37mm AAA used as a median, each circle is 2.5km in radius) ![]() The most common layout is a “rose” layout, with 4-8 AAA guns arranged in a circle with communication paths and trenches either around in a circle, or spidering out from the middle. A typical layout from South East Pongyang: ![]() However AAA is going to have a very difficult time intercepting cruise missiles. The logical counter to cruise missiles is sophisticated fast response targeting systems integrated with highly agile SAMs. Discussion on NK's air defence here. P.S. You need to register to see the pics This post has been edited by noavatar: Apr 7 2013, 11:31 PM |
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
The biggest threats of the entire North Korean military though are their SCUDs and the artillery [Gas, Chemical, and HE (High Explosive)] that is in range of Seoul.
|
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Good article about NK missile defence can be found here. entitled "What do North Korea's air defenses look like?"
|
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 10:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2013, 10:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Dunno bout u guys....but this thought keeps bugging at the back of my mind...maybe big bro PRC wants to test US response and system...so small bro do dirty job...coz small bro in deep shit with economy and all that....I might be wrong bout this |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 01:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
MILITARY SPENDINGS AS % OF GDP (2012)
Malaysia 2.0 % Singapore 3.7 % Thailand 1.9 % Indonesia 0.7 % Brunei 3.1 % Philippines 0.8 % Vietnam 2.5 % WORLD 2.2% Source |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Hi guys....u all think PAK FA on the card for next MRCA |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 10:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
I found an interesting article on the Air Power Australia Analyses website. Too long to to post it here....give quite detail assessment of PAK FA. You can read it here |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 10:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 11:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
QUOTE(kinabalu @ Apr 9 2013, 11:03 AM) ....so can our mat rempits....I mean pilots do the Pacak....aka the Cobra Maneuver...like this SU 35 or go direct here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsyMUAfh6fg This post has been edited by noavatar: Apr 9 2013, 11:19 AM |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 01:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
![]() |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 01:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Rafale Emitting flares
![]() |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 02:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Eurofighter Typhoon vs Dassault Rafale--let the battle begin !!
![]() |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 02:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
SEAD Tactics - Suppression of Enemy Air Defense
![]() Note: The Thales RBE2 radar is of the passive electronically-scanned-array (ESA) type, with a single power source, transmitter, receiver, and a physically fixed array of phase-shifter modules to steer the beam. The radar has a single beam - unlike the active ESA used on the F-22 and JSF - but it can be pointed instantly in any direction so that it can use a wide variety of interleaved modes. Dassault describes it as the difference between "track while scan" and "track here while scan there." For example, the RBE2 can readily track airborne targets while searching for a target on the ground or providing a ground profile for terrain-following flight. But Thales announced that its RBE2 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar has successfully completed a new series of tests on the Rafale at the Cazaux flight test centre in Southwest France from February to March. So current version can be outfitted with RBE2 AESA. Advantages are many. Example: range extended by over 50% higher module reliability for reduced cost of ownership (no array overhaul required for 10 years) high-resolution imagery in air-to-ground mode and better resistance to jamming This post has been edited by noavatar: Apr 9 2013, 03:17 PM |
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 03:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Bugatti Veyron vs Eurofighter Typhoon
![]() |
|
|
Apr 12 2013, 06:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
QUOTE(Dreamhunter @ Apr 12 2013, 05:38 PM) This is what we could do. Offer alliance with China, throwing in some believable JV in arms equipment manufacturing and/or servicing into the overall deal, and give them some time to mull over it. But make it clear, very clear, to them that we don't want them messing about on James Shoal or anywhere else close to our waters. We already have a win-win situation whereby China is investing multi-billion-ringgit investments at the 605ha Malaysia-China Kuantan Industrial Park (MCKIP) in Gebeng, Kuantan, along with its sister park in the China-Malaysia Qinzhou Industrial Park in Nanning. Guangxi Beibu Gulf International Port Group invest RM 5 billion for three projects in the park, another RM3 billion by the Guangxi Beibu Gulf International Port Group and IJM Corporation Berhad in the Kuantan Port expansion project and RM2.5 billion by the Master developer which is made up of a joint venture between a Malaysia consortium and China consortium.We also have to lodge a formal protest at international level, or else any potential future action on our part via ICJ won't hold water. At the same time, arrange exercises with US and Japan, while ordering something affordable but immediately useful from Russia, like a dozen or so ship-busting attack aircraft of proven performance and reliability. We could widen our search for something suitable to Rafale, Typhoon etc. That's what our LIMA is for, among others, isn't it? As a small country, we have to learn the skills of meaningful multiple alliances and diplomatic tai chi, and keep those skills well honed. We could learn some things in this regard from Pakistan. Also China Harbour Engineering Co Ltd, is involved in building the 22.5km Second Penang Bridge. In fact we were the first Southeast Asian nation to establish diplomatic ties with China in 1974. Next year, Kuala Lumpur and Beijing will mark the 40th year anniversary of the bilateral ties by designating 2014 as "Malaysia-China Friendship Year". China has loan two panda cubs – Feng Yi (female) and Fu Wa (male) – for 10 years to mark the 40th anniversary of diplomatic ties between the two nations in 2014. So I think in SEA we could say we are a China-friendly nation and we should be able to handle the said James Shoal incidence with diplomacy and not confrontation. This post has been edited by noavatar: Apr 12 2013, 06:59 PM |
|
|
Apr 12 2013, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
QUOTE(Dreamhunter @ Apr 12 2013, 06:58 PM) Exactly...and it might turn out that it is China's response and reaction to the joint US-Phillipines military exercise or even the Lahad Datu attack. (THis is only my speculation)The official line is: Chinese officials said they “were determined to safeguard the country’s sovereignty with their services on the South China Sea” during a ceremony at uninhabited James Shoal, according to Xinhua news agency and the People’s Daily Online, the Communist Party’s official newspaper. This post has been edited by noavatar: Apr 12 2013, 08:08 PM |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0627sec
0.34
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:55 AM |