Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Science Physics question - Fluid mechanics, Dispensing constant volume calculation

views
     
TSclark8529
post Dec 3 2012, 02:16 PM, updated 13y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
Hi All,

I am looking for help in an academic question. This is a real application in dispensing industry whereby I need to calculate dispensing pressure applicable at different volume within a 30cc syringe so that the output volume dispensing will be constant.
I have laid out a diagram on this system but unsure how I can share the diagram in forums.

Please help.

Thanks.
Clark.
Critical_Fallacy
post Dec 4 2012, 12:08 AM

∫nnộvisεr
Group Icon
VIP
3,713 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
From: Torino
QUOTE(clark8529 @ Dec 3 2012, 02:16 PM)
I need to calculate dispensing pressure applicable at different volume within a 30cc syringe so that the output volume dispensing will be constant.
Hi Clark,

This sounds like a Control problem, where you need to derive the Transfer Function using Laplace transform and then evaluate the System Response. Can you put up the block diagram?

(1) Understanding the fluid system

In analyzing systems involving fluid flow, you find it necessary to divide flow regimes into laminar flow and turbulent flow, according to the magnitude of the Reynolds number. If the Reynolds number is greater than about 3000 to 4000, then the flow is turbulent. The flow is laminar if the Reynolds number is less than about 2000. In the laminar case, fluid flow occurs in streamlines with no turbulence. Systems involving laminar flow may be represented by linear differential equations.

(2) Modeling via Differential Equations

Anyway, you can make a model of the rate of dispensing pressure simple enough to understand only by making simplifying assumptions and lumping together effects that may or may not belong together, by deriving the relations among the rates of change of the variables of interest using differential equations.

Once you’ve built the model, you should compare predictions of the model with data from the system. If the model and the system agree, then you gain confidence that the assumptions you made in creating the model are reasonable, and you can use the model to make predictions. If the system and the model disagree, then you must study and improve your assumptions. In either case, you'll learn more about the system by comparing it to the model.

The types of predictions that are reasonable depend on your assumptions. If your model is based on precise rules such as Navier–Stokes equations, then you can use the model to make very accurate quantitative predictions. If the assumptions are less precise or if the model is a simplified version of the system, then precise quantitative predictions would be silly. For your info, Navier–Stokes equations are a set of differential equations which describe the motion of a fluid.

(3) Numerical Methods

If the analytical approach fails, numerical methods provide quantitative information about solutions even if you cannot find their formulas. There is also the advantage that most of the work can be done by computers. The disadvantage is that you obtain only approximations, not precise solutions. If you remain aware of this fact and are prudent, numerical methods become powerful tools for estimating the rate of dispensing pressure.


TSclark8529
post Dec 5 2012, 03:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Dec 4 2012, 01:08 AM)
Hi Clark,

This sounds like a Control problem, where you need to derive the Transfer Function using Laplace transform and then evaluate the System Response. Can you put up the block diagram?

(1) Understanding the fluid system

In analyzing systems involving fluid flow, you find it necessary to divide flow regimes into laminar flow and turbulent flow, according to the magnitude of the Reynolds number. If the Reynolds number is greater than about 3000 to 4000, then the flow is turbulent. The flow is laminar if the Reynolds number is less than about 2000. In the laminar case, fluid flow occurs in streamlines with no turbulence. Systems involving laminar flow may be represented by linear differential equations.

(2) Modeling via Differential Equations

Anyway, you can make a model of the rate of dispensing pressure simple enough to understand only by making simplifying assumptions and lumping together effects that may or may not belong together, by deriving the relations among the rates of change of the variables of interest using differential equations.

Once you’ve built the model, you should compare predictions of the model with data from the system. If the model and the system agree, then you gain confidence that the assumptions you made in creating the model are reasonable, and you can use the model to make predictions. If the system and the model disagree, then you must study and improve your assumptions. In either case, you'll learn more about the system by comparing it to the model.

The types of predictions that are reasonable depend on your assumptions. If your model is based on precise rules such as Navier–Stokes equations, then you can use the model to make very accurate quantitative predictions. If the assumptions are less precise or if the model is a simplified version of the system, then precise quantitative predictions would be silly. For your info, Navier–Stokes equations are a set of differential equations which describe the motion of a fluid.

(3) Numerical Methods

If the analytical approach fails, numerical methods provide quantitative information about solutions even if you cannot find their formulas. There is also the advantage that most of the work can be done by computers. The disadvantage is that you obtain only approximations, not precise solutions. If you remain aware of this fact and are prudent, numerical methods become powerful tools for estimating the rate of dispensing pressure.
*
I don't have a block diagram to show here because I am not actually designing a variable pressure dispensing system here but rather plotting a pressure dispensing chart out. My interest here is on how I can derive a formula to calculate what is the appropriate pressure to apply for every 0.5ml dispensed.

Here's the condition I am having:
1. A 30cc syringe is mounted to a vertical shaft at 40 deg with respect to the shaft.
2. The diameter of the 30cc syringe is known d=21.7mm.
3. The fluid in syringe has viscosity of 3500 cPs, density of 1.19.
4. The height of 81.2mm.
5. At full load, pressure applied to dispense a line is 100 kPa. Every 0.5ml, it is expected to increase pressure applied to maintained volume dispensed out. The question is, how much of increment?

Assume, fluid viscosity is constant all the time and fluid friction is negligible.
Critical_Fallacy
post Dec 5 2012, 04:35 PM

∫nnộvisεr
Group Icon
VIP
3,713 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
From: Torino
QUOTE(clark8529 @ Dec 5 2012, 03:21 PM)
My interest here is on how I can derive a formula to calculate what is the appropriate pressure to apply for every 0.5ml dispensed.

Here's the condition I am having:
1. A 30cc syringe is mounted to a vertical shaft at 40 deg with respect to the shaft.
2. The diameter of the 30cc syringe is known d=21.7mm.
3. The fluid in syringe has viscosity of 3500 cPs, density of 1.19.
4. The height of 81.2mm.
5. At full load, pressure applied to dispense a line is 100 kPa. Every 0.5ml, it is expected to increase pressure applied to maintained volume dispensed out. The question is, how much of increment?

Assume, fluid viscosity is constant all the time and fluid friction is negligible.
I don't sense any technical difficulty if you can sketch a good & simple fluid flow diagram. It helps to make the problem more transparent. A picture is worth a thousand words. By the way, what is your discipline? Mechanical Engineering? Are you taking or teaching the Fluid Mechanics course now?
TSclark8529
post Dec 7 2012, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Dec 5 2012, 05:35 PM)
I don't sense any technical difficulty if you can sketch a good & simple fluid flow diagram. It helps to make the problem more transparent. A picture is worth a thousand words. By the way, what is your discipline? Mechanical Engineering? Are you taking or teaching the Fluid Mechanics course now?
*
My background is in Mechanical Engineering. eversince I joined in manufacturing field as manufacturing engineer in electronic industry for 3 years. Didn't deal much with deep calculation in physics for these 3 years, so I am a lot rusty in my fluid mechanics. I am trying to solve a dispensing issue by simulation first. Creating the equations are important so that it will shorten the work effectively.

I am attaching a simple workout here. Could you please kindly help to just check out if my conclusion is right? It's in the PDF.


Attached File(s)
Attached File  Dispensing_question.pdf ( 33.99k ) Number of downloads: 22
TSOM
post Jan 10 2013, 05:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,145 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: 1BORNEO
Hmm.. this actually doesn't involve "high level" fluid mechanics such as turbulent/laminar flow, Reynolds, PDE and Navier-stokes...

Looks more like simple physics question .. hmm.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0162sec    0.31    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 05:56 PM