On the other hand, got money to buy the phone but want to touch cheap plastics.

For a few past phones, I have not purchased screen protector. It always look better without one and I don't have problem with scratched screen yet.

General public has been (mis)guided with the trend that screen protectors and casing are necessity for their mobile phones. We don't use screen protectors or casing for our device back then and they are all fine. Devices after devices that I own, without screen protector, doesn't even suffer a scratch on the screen.

I'm not generalizing that screen protector are utterly useless, there are indeed heavy duty users that require such protection. But often, if such rough handling is required, the screen protector would not be significant enough to maintain the aesthetics of the entire device.

I have tried a range of screen protectors, from RM2 unbranded to SGPs. Here are some that I observed:
- No SP will make the screen look good. It's only being worse in different levels
- Screen protectors sold few years ago are cheap and lasts way better than those sold now. Inexpensive ones today are just simply waste of time, effort and money. I see this as exploitation of screen protector demand. Boo to the manufacturers
- Whatever ultra crystal or oleophobic are just gimmick compared to the original screen

I am a paranoid gadget user; but with screen protectors, I've 'been there done that'. This isn't a command, but just my personal views. If you'd like to testify on your own will, remove the miserable plastic off your phone, the experience is just a whole lot different.