QUOTE(Amanda85 @ May 30 2007, 11:44 AM)
as i went back b4 d result was anounce, didn't notice about it until today...terribly shock that they did such a thing,.....n still trying to sound as if they r right 2 impose such law to show fair play...
N I havent even told d whole story of wat actually happened on Olympic day. If I did, dunno where dey'll hide deir faces. Just dunno wat to do with dese puppy peoplelah.
Yarman, wat dey hv done is demeaning to d word 'Olympics' & 'fairplay'. Can you imagine dem saying that deir decision is fair to all participants ... guess Groovy doesnt even qualify as a participant in deir eyes.

Added on May 31, 2007, 12:14 amQUOTE(Amanda85 @ May 30 2007, 11:44 AM)
n yet now they wanted to state tat pet-n-you own committee dominate in their own agility event.....as in fact, pp.com dare not come over 2 join in the challenge...
N he dares to make such sweeping statements without having even attended any of the petnu events, wat a funny man. Naturally petnu will dominate as:
- > 90% of the agility trial participants r from petnu,
- petnu dogs r properly trained in agility n can perform on d field,
- d puppy people struggle to produce decent agility dogs who cn perform at trials.

But d real reason is that dey actually discourage deir members from participating in other dog events. Have personally heard dis from d members demselves, who wish 2 attend other events but r told otherwise.
This post has been edited by groovemaster: May 31 2007, 12:14 AM