What's the minimum focus distsnce for the lowest end Sony NEX 3N?
The SONY NEX Discussion Thread ver. 3N
The SONY NEX Discussion Thread ver. 3N
|
|
Jul 29 2013, 12:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,538 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
What's the minimum focus distsnce for the lowest end Sony NEX 3N?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 29 2013, 10:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,538 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2013, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,538 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
QUOTE(redlyfs @ Jul 30 2013, 10:36 AM) Yes I'd like to do some macro photography, so I'll have to settle for normal compacts then. Really surprised with this as most compacts also around 3cm edi, some until 1cm. But I understand that general image quality will lose to nex. |
|
|
Aug 2 2013, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,538 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
QUOTE(ChinWY @ Jul 30 2013, 05:31 PM) Some compact will even go sub 1 cm. but the sensor size is small and yes, image quality is not there at all.. You can go nearer if you are using old manual lens.. just shim with extension tubes.... cheap and nasty but works just a well unless you are the serious macro photographer. The other issue is subject to distance magnification.. usually you will find a longer lens will work better for most situaiton than a shorter lens.. look around and you will see the 100mm range are about the best for macro work for APSC sensor because it give you 1:1 and you have good distance to camera. Before I started changing my setup with full manual lens, I use my SEL55210 for macro work.. cant really get that close but a lot bigger image than I could with my kit lens. Do note that when you get too close, exposure will become an issue... so are shadows. If you new and seriously into macro, do your homework before you consider compact.. there is quite a bit of workflow to understand. Each hurdle will have a new issue to overcome. The solutions may not be expensive if you understand its limits. Most important is the base system you have selected. QUOTE(RX-78-2 @ Jul 30 2013, 10:49 PM) Wow, so complex. Actually photography is just my hobby, I'm not taking it that seriously. As long as it can produce some decent results, I'll be happy enough. I guess a good compact will be alright, it's quite a lot cheaper too since my budget is quite tight. |
|
|
Aug 3 2013, 12:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,538 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
QUOTE(poolcarpet @ Aug 3 2013, 12:36 AM) Dslr sensor will produce better quality photos compared to compact. If you're new and really just want to take some pretty good quality photos at a budget, consider the panasonic lumix dmc-lx7. I think it can go as close as 1cm for macro shots. Check out the reviews. Yeah I'm eyeing that. But also quite keen on LX5 and Canon S100 as they're cheaper. Really impressed with S100 especially, as it's so much smaller, but minimum focus is 3cm which is still ok.But of course, once you step into dslr world, you may never want to go back to compact unless somehow portability and convenience is still more important to you For DSLR, maybe later on la....when I have bigger budget. This post has been edited by danielcmugen: Aug 3 2013, 12:42 AM |
|
|
Aug 8 2013, 12:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,538 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
QUOTE(ChinWY @ Jul 30 2013, 05:31 PM) Some compact will even go sub 1 cm. but the sensor size is small and yes, image quality is not there at all.. You can go nearer if you are using old manual lens.. just shim with extension tubes.... cheap and nasty but works just a well unless you are the serious macro photographer. The other issue is subject to distance magnification.. usually you will find a longer lens will work better for most situaiton than a shorter lens.. look around and you will see the 100mm range are about the best for macro work for APSC sensor because it give you 1:1 and you have good distance to camera. Before I started changing my setup with full manual lens, I use my SEL55210 for macro work.. cant really get that close but a lot bigger image than I could with my kit lens. Do note that when you get too close, exposure will become an issue... so are shadows. If you new and seriously into macro, do your homework before you consider compact.. there is quite a bit of workflow to understand. Each hurdle will have a new issue to overcome. The solutions may not be expensive if you understand its limits. Most important is the base system you have selected. QUOTE(RX-78-2 @ Jul 30 2013, 10:49 PM) How much does the old manual lens + extension tube cost? How close can it go in macro shooting? |
|
|
Aug 8 2013, 02:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,538 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
QUOTE(RX-78-2 @ Aug 8 2013, 01:58 AM) old manual lens price can be RM100 to RM1k++ and above depends on brand, model and conditions. RM100 manual lens can go how close including extension tube? This cheap 1 ok to use or not?Extension tube is about RM30++ for a set of 3 tubes. It can be up to very close depends on the lens. this is without optical elements so it not affect the image quality much. Don't buy those Magnifier type of Macro extension lens. it is quite useless with only can get sharp at the tiny center portion. you can also use reverse macro ring which a lot of DSLR experts using. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0357sec
1.28
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 08:00 PM |