QUOTE(Chinoz @ Dec 12 2012, 06:11 PM)
I wouldn't say that. I absolutely love my hollow bracelet for the weight and comfort factor. Not a fan of the chunky bracelets ala SubC/PO-C.
Plus, despite the old stamped clasp looking like something straight out from a Swatch, I think there's a hint of classic-ness to it, like the Subs from days gone by.
Just personal preference really. The only thing I like about the new Sub is the blue lume

But on the flipside, is there really such a thing as a bad Sub? I liken them to the Porsche 911s.
Every generation looks more or less the same (evolution, not revolution), but with new tech that makes the new one better. Yet people harp on and on about how the newer generation lacks feel and passion and the outgoing model is the
ultimate classic

I think that depends on when it was bought and the purpose. I wanted a daily and possibly the only watch (though that didn't happen) so actually it was the bracelet the tip me over to the Explorer 1 when holding both models in the AD.
Bad sub? 2 tone subs?
QUOTE(h11g @ Dec 12 2012, 06:21 PM)
but i really love how the rolex logo protrudes out of the closing clasp on the new sub c. looks more classy.
This one I don't like actually... it's scratches stuff.
QUOTE(Catnip @ Dec 13 2012, 02:17 AM)
Since 5513 is in production from 1963 to 1990, there's probably millions in the market today. Those that fetch high prices that I have seen are military and comex issued watches. I'm not the expert on Rolex and I was hoping that you can enlighten me instead.

Yeah... that price estimate is also consistent with what I notice here too.
And the 5513 cost less than USD200 when it was brand new!!

source:
http://minus4plus6.com/PriceEvolution.htmThis post has been edited by sniper on the roof: Dec 13 2012, 10:16 AM