just bear in mind that different photography style works for different visual presentation. hilmiangah's are not applicable in all situation, that's why if you look at computer hardware website, it's all white background and all parts shown clearly because consumers want to see full thing.
the style hilmi used is of course, great for brochures or features that show a little highlight to get people's attention.
in fact some of Hilmi's photos has too much black space, which is not good. the first 2 pics are alright, the other 2 has decent highlights but barely pass due to too much dark areas and quite some distractions.
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Oct 21 2012, 09:46 AM)
product photography is not about clear sharp picture and white background and bokeh alone
let me correct you on a few things.
1. product photography, has always been about clear / sharp pictures.
2. yes it's not about white background but product photo with white background makes it easy to manipulate, and easiest to apply on any design, whether print, web, whatever - because it works.
3. product photography has never been about bokeh to begin with. It's about Depth of Field.
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Oct 21 2012, 09:46 AM)
white background should be white all over not grey on some and white on the rest
not necessarily.
you can see for yourself
http://www.shutterstock.com/g/briancyc how many are not white all over. there's more here
http://www.dreamstime.com/Goldfries_more-latest-adition_pg1QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Oct 21 2012, 09:46 AM)
made use of the lighting to accentuate the product
this is correct.
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Oct 21 2012, 09:46 AM)
and to me the usual side shot and 45" shot just wont cut it anymore
there was never a fixed rule for angle.

QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Oct 21 2012, 09:46 AM)
use the part of the product to highlight the feature of it
use LIGHT to highlight the product feature.
QUOTE(rx330 @ Oct 23 2012, 10:16 AM)
hilmiangah pics nice, makes me wanna buy that product
cant work for me though with adam's style
maybe every consumer see it differently
if you were to give me hilmi's photos vs adam's photos and ask me who would I hire, I would go for Adam's.
simply because 2 out of 2 of Adam's photos look fine here but 2 out of 4 of Hilmi's photo shows the photographer's lack of care in detail and composition.
that aside, Hilmi - keep up the good work. The above sharing is for you to learn and improve.