Nov 19 2012, 05:55 PM
QUOTE(cockee @ Nov 16 2012, 04:24 PM)
Yeah, people got frustrated. Why? Because some developer repeatedly fails to rectify the issues faced by the purchasers.
Question is, does anyone have any idea how efficient has Villamas been? Yeah, I know because I experienced it. The answer is NOT VERY EFFICIENT at all. If they are so efficient, please ask them, as on late Oct, why there is no confirmed date to fix Atmosfera's elevators yet?
Please why only few months after handovers already got flooding problem in basement carpark and common corridor when it rains heavily? Why even the barbeque pit got issue?
I am not over generalizing. I speak with specifics. And why I dare to say all this without fearing libel lawsuit from Villamas? Because it is all true.
Actually i read about Villamas's shoddy workmanship before I purchased Atmosfera. I thought, this condo is their first venture into the higher-end market, so they will put in 110% to make sure this project is a success. Then they will have a good example to showcase when they market Serin, Zefer and Verde.
Well, I don't know how many % they put in in reality, but I know it is definitely NOT GOOD enough!
So what make anyone think they have learned their lesson?
Hi cockee, I can feel your frustration too.. Question is, does anyone have any idea how efficient has Villamas been? Yeah, I know because I experienced it. The answer is NOT VERY EFFICIENT at all. If they are so efficient, please ask them, as on late Oct, why there is no confirmed date to fix Atmosfera's elevators yet?
Please why only few months after handovers already got flooding problem in basement carpark and common corridor when it rains heavily? Why even the barbeque pit got issue?
I am not over generalizing. I speak with specifics. And why I dare to say all this without fearing libel lawsuit from Villamas? Because it is all true.
Actually i read about Villamas's shoddy workmanship before I purchased Atmosfera. I thought, this condo is their first venture into the higher-end market, so they will put in 110% to make sure this project is a success. Then they will have a good example to showcase when they market Serin, Zefer and Verde.
Well, I don't know how many % they put in in reality, but I know it is definitely NOT GOOD enough!
So what make anyone think they have learned their lesson?
I am not sure how to put it, but with whatever defects at the common area which is identified at Atmosfera which is "just merely a fixable issue", some have been rectified (credits to Villamas)
But generally, I believe there are defects (there are also spoilt stuffs which are causing inconveniences and security concerns to residents) which are still not rectified since VP in May this year. Brandonho just mentioned that "does anyone have any idea how efficient has Villamas been, when it comes to rectifying defects and addressing resident's concerns", haha, this shows how efficient Villamas has been to their purchasers.
Is Villamas not serious and concern about their reputation? Well, to me, if current purchasers are given such treatment by Villamas, this gives me a doubt on how they are going to treat the purchasers of their new development. I might be "few out of the thousands" who are raising my concerns here, so my advice to people who are interested in this project to check out with purchasers of Atmosfera (or any other previous projects by Villamas) whether this developer is doing a good job in rectifying issues or "adopting a tidak-apa attitude"
Like abgkik, I am not stopping the people from buying. Good location and price anyways. Just beware!
This post has been edited by DarkTemplar: Nov 19 2012, 05:56 PM
Quote
0.0146sec
0.45
7 queries
GZIP Disabled