QUOTE(cybpsych @ Feb 21 2013, 08:34 AM)
Actually u can call the showroom b4 going...they might have some ready stok or waiting to be passed over mica greyOfficial Club 6th Gen Mitsubishi Mirage 2012/2013, 1.2 3A92 MIVEC. Power to weight ratio !
Official Club 6th Gen Mitsubishi Mirage 2012/2013, 1.2 3A92 MIVEC. Power to weight ratio !
|
|
Feb 22 2013, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2013, 11:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
QUOTE(johnance17 @ Feb 18 2013, 03:57 PM) Hi, Hi......i drive a manual mirage.......i manage to get 17km/l manually counted on full tank. Based on my odo meter i get usual readings of 18km/l and without aircon i can get 20km/l...btw this is city drive not highway... (30 km traveled one way) I passed lost count of traffic lights.. From my experience from gear 1 to 3 try to change gear before 2k ...but do not change gear at very low rpm before gear 3 cause i notice underpower gear makes ur engine consumes more fuel. Average drive below 100kph will give u better FC than above 100kph... From my experience driving above 70 will give good fc on manual... Before reaching each stop usually i will free the gear to N and let it rolls to the point i have to break.. U don need the gear on since u r stopping right.... When u want to move on 1st gear try to let ur car roll a bit by realeasing lil bit of gear so the car can roll before you accelerate.... With this you don have to accel hard. And the clutch is good in mirage cause its light and its easily controlled i can use gear 1 even without stepping the clutch after gear change..oil control pedal very good control too.... One more thing i noticed that on gear 4 mainting rpm 1.5k give good fc don have to purposely change to gear 5 for lower fc cause this makes ur engine shivers on the underpower which consumes more fuel.... But u do need to change to gear 5 for higher speeds.... Hello guys, I am new here,i just bought this car (Mirage) and its just a month old, i read all the post from page 1 to page 50 and i tried all the possible solution i saw here 0-70kph @1.5k rpm, 70-100kph @2k rpm (correct me if im wrong,2k rpm is hard to maintain when you are at this speed coz in my experience its playing around 2.1 to 2.4 k @ gear 5), but i only manage max 12km/L and if it is traffic this figure goes below 8.5km/L city driving, my question is how do you guys reached those fc, if it is heavy traffic do you still managed to reach those fc, and what fuel are you using coz me im using the octane 93, is higher octane really makes difference in terms of fc? Thanks guys.... Fyi...... Rpm levels on CVT N manual is different |
|
|
Feb 22 2013, 11:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2013, 12:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 24 2013, 01:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2013, 10:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
QUOTE(Edison83 @ Mar 4 2013, 09:35 AM) yours manual, lain cerita Yup.. Agree edison manual lain cerita.....hehe....whole diff story somore....u wan power......take manual lo...... Can rev and still achieving good fc....... But round 16 - 17 km/ lCVT can reach 100kmph merely 2.2k rpm First of all I like to say is that the car is equip with CVT which mean you wont be driving like 4AT car. I notice a lot ppl keep saying noisy engine noise, it only happen to be loud when you rev kaw kaw~ which mean you are driving the car like a 4AT. First my thought was same as you guys, the engine are noisy, but after awhile you adapted to CVT, you wont be reving here and there. So its actually very quite inside. Second, I don't know why ppl keep saying this car tarak power~~. It was advertise as a ECO car, which mean the car was build to save fuel and environment not speed and power. Maybe some ppl having trouble reading... |
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 04:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2011 |
QUOTE(clickNsnap @ Mar 5 2013, 03:57 PM) Seem like the CVT version has better FC than the MT version, I thought MT always has better FC... It is worth paying RM8k or RM5k more (than MT) for the CVT GS or GL respectively? Look like the MT only save RM8k or RM5k up front... how about in the long run... I means MT is cheaper to maintain and so on... Funny thing is this is wat i tought at the first place....MT saves more fuel...then after joining the club and do comparison seems CVT saves more fuel but for CVT the driver makes big diff in FC...... Some drivers don really get better FC than me (MT) some CVT driver get very very good FC (unbelievable result)..... But i believe if u wanna feel pick up (power) u can choose MT and i feel even if i rev my MT i doesnt change much of the FC but does cost a lilttle more.... But clutching is tired work if ur place very jam...i stay in ipoh so i don mind...hehehe and i'm used to driving MT...my last car was a wira 1.5 and i rev a lot....so quite satisfied to MT so i can continue reving the car hehehehMT Mirage owners, why you've made the choice of getting the MT version? Mind to share? Thanks. And MT is definietly cheaper in maintaining ...u can see the diff in the service and labor charges... But it does need parts to be replaced such a clutch pad, etc etc.....me no mechanic don wan tunjuk pandai pandai hehehe..... That's my story |
| Change to: | 0.0168sec
0.33
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 01:03 PM |