aren't this green colour up for sale in malaysia?? never seen any SA selling..love the colour   

guys...want to ask, my mum's mirage is the top spec, but why when put in USB to the kenwood dpx-u5120, although inside USB got 800++ songs, but it only can play the 1st 255 songs in the USB?

guys...want to ask, my mum's mirage is the top spec, but why when put in USB to the kenwood dpx-u5120, although inside USB got 800++ songs, but it only can play the 1st 255 songs in the USB?

Are u sure that all files mp3 format?

Only can play Mp3 and WMA format.
U need press change folder if you put it in folder. Press the band button to change

On the other hand, any of the LYN going for the ECo challenge coming this 16th March?

yes...all are mp3 format.

but i just notice, 1 folder maximum can have 255 songs only, so i need to separate it to few folders . wonder the random all function will play songs randomly from all folders or not

theres always a limit bro
even windows also have limit

Hi......i drive a manual mirage.......i manage to get 17km/l manually counted on full tank. Based on my odo meter i get usual readings of 18km/l and without aircon i can get 20km/l...btw this is city drive not highway... (30 km traveled one way) I passed lost count of traffic lights.. From my experience from gear 1 to 3 try to change gear before 2k ...but do not change gear at very low rpm before gear 3 cause i notice underpower gear makes ur engine consumes more fuel. Average drive below 100kph will give u better FC than above 100kph...  From my experience driving above 70 will give good fc on manual... Before reaching each stop usually i will free the gear to N and let it rolls to the point i have to break.. U don need the gear on since u r stopping right.... When u want to move on 1st gear try to let ur car roll a bit by realeasing lil bit of gear so the car can roll before you accelerate.... With this you don have to accel hard. And the clutch is good in mirage cause its light and its easily controlled i can use gear 1 even without stepping the clutch after gear change..oil control pedal very good control too.... One more thing i noticed that  on gear 4 mainting rpm 1.5k give good fc don have to purposely change to gear 5 for lower fc cause this makes ur engine shivers on the underpower which consumes more fuel.... But u do need to change to gear 5 for higher speeds....

Fyi...... Rpm levels on CVT N manual is different

hi, wat is the rpm when cruising @110kph on your manual transmission.

Went test drive this car today. Engine sound is noticeable , quite loud in fact in the cabin. I was fetching three adults behind and the SA sat in front. The engine is quite revvy as it reach 3-4k rpm easily. Didn't notice if i really rev that hard to move the car or what however it has to be around 4k rpm to feel that power. To be fair the power is definitely sufficient for a 850 kg car.
if I were to get this car, probably will add more sound prooof material and change to quieter tyre, to make it even more outstanding.
the only feature that attracts me is the fc. But, Do we have to drive so eco-mindedly to get at least 17/18km per liter? Which I think it doesn't really serve the purpose of a car , in practical, we have to fetch ppl;high aircond speed due to hot weather;overtake as in rushing for meeting..and etc etc it ends up with a Fc just like a myvi or other higher cc cars.
does it justify the premium price we pay over a myvi (as a close competitor). What I trying to say is we work for the car to save fuel instead of a car work for us to save fuel.
I still prefer mirage over the myvi , but the above points makes me in doubt to order or not yet.

Basically 100 kph at approx 3k......

yours manual, lain cerita

CVT can reach 100kmph merely 2.2k rpm

First of all I like to say is that the car is equip with CVT which mean you wont be driving like 4AT car. I notice a lot ppl keep saying noisy engine noise, it only happen to be loud when you rev kaw kaw~ which mean you are driving the car like a 4AT. First my thought was same as you guys, the engine are noisy, but after awhile you adapted to CVT, you wont be reving here and there. So its actually very quite inside.

Second, I don't know why ppl keep saying this car tarak power~~. It was advertise as a ECO car, which mean the car was build to save fuel and environment not speed and power. Maybe some ppl having trouble reading...

yours manual, lain cerita

CVT can reach 100kmph merely 2.2k rpm

First of all I like to say is that the car is equip with CVT which mean you wont be driving like 4AT car. I notice a lot ppl keep saying noisy engine noise, it only happen to be loud when you rev kaw kaw~ which mean you are driving the car like a 4AT. First my thought was same as you guys, the engine are noisy, but after awhile you adapted to CVT, you wont be reving here and there. So its actually very quite inside.

Second, I don't know why ppl keep saying this car tarak power~~. It was advertise as a ECO car, which mean the car was build to save fuel and environment not speed and power. Maybe some ppl having trouble reading...

yours manual, lain cerita

CVT can reach 100kmph merely 2.2k rpm

First of all I like to say is that the car is equip with CVT which mean you wont be driving like 4AT car. I notice a lot ppl keep saying noisy engine noise, it only happen to be loud when you rev kaw kaw~ which mean you are driving the car like a 4AT. First my thought was same as you guys, the engine are noisy, but after awhile you adapted to CVT, you wont be reving here and there. So its actually very quite inside.

Second, I don't know why ppl keep saying this car tarak power~~. It was advertise as a ECO car, which mean the car was build to save fuel and environment not speed and power. Maybe some ppl having trouble reading...

Seem like the CVT version has better FC than the MT version, I thought MT always has better FC... It is worth paying RM8k or RM5k more (than MT) for the CVT GS or GL respectively? Look like the MT only save RM8k or RM5k up front... how about in the long run... I means MT is cheaper to maintain and so on...

MT Mirage owners, why you've made the choice of getting the MT version? Mind to share? Thanks.

Funny thing is this is wat i tought at the first place....MT saves more fuel...then after joining the club and do comparison seems CVT saves more fuel but for CVT the driver makes big diff in FC...... Some drivers don really get better FC than me (MT) some CVT driver get very very good FC (unbelievable result)..... But i believe if u wanna feel pick up (power) u can choose MT and i feel even if i rev my MT i doesnt change much of the FC but does cost a lilttle more.... But clutching is tired work if ur place very jam...i stay in ipoh so i don mind...hehehe  and i'm used to driving MT...my last car was a wira 1.5 and i rev a lot....so quite satisfied to MT so i can continue reving the car heheheh

And MT is definietly cheaper in maintaining ...u can see the diff in the service and labor charges... But it does need parts to be replaced such a clutch pad, etc etc.....me no mechanic don wan tunjuk pandai pandai hehehe..... That's my story

Thanks for sharing.

I am in KL/PJ area, traffic jam is every where... I am driving a 8 years old AT Avanza 1.3 at the moment, mine FC was around 10km/L (RM50 petrol, 26.315L can get about 260km), after reading some sifu's tip here... keeping low rpm, keeping my Avanza at 2.5k rpm, I can get almost 12km/L... heheh not bad ah! 

Now, I am deciding to get new Mirage AT or MT... or keeping the old car. 

By the way, some car companies offering discount for old stock, any discount for those left over 2012 model for Mirage? Any freebie for 2013 new model?