Focus has autopark. Focus interior is soo cramped!
Dilemma between ford focus and kia optima k5
Dilemma between ford focus and kia optima k5
|
|
Oct 18 2012, 12:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,848 posts Joined: Dec 2009 From: Ampang |
Focus has autopark. Focus interior is soo cramped!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 2012, 10:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,848 posts Joined: Dec 2009 From: Ampang |
QUOTE(john2986 @ Oct 22 2012, 05:50 PM) I am also facing the same problem... but m more towards the k5, cause: I confirmed with Ford in the FoFo FB page that it is only meant as a side lamp, not a DRL. Similar system to the Preve.1) The design is great, no doubt about that... 2) I am 185cm, when I sit in the focus, i need to push the driver's seat almost all the way back, then left with a space only enough for kid.. 3) The optima has been lauched for quite a long time now in US, so far, no bad comments, or and recalls.. for tat u can always check youtube and surf around the net and look for it... 4) Ok, may be this is a bit too much, but the glove box is kinda too small in focus, and I dont like the centre arm rest cabinet, cause if u see carefully, it is held closed by plastics, I mean, both hook and lock are made of plastic... (feels a bit cheap) 5) The push button start for focus, is not really a nice 'push button start' system, wat i mean is, you need to press and hold on to the button till the engine stays on, whereas most other push button start system, you just need to press and release.. 6) Although focus comes with push button start, but you can notice they didnt redesign the dash properly, cause it wont take long for u to notice that there is actually a hole (looks like originally for the key ignition) which is covered by a plastic cap. 7) There is no doubt the driving experience is better for focus, you can really feel it, just the steering and suspension, ford has done very well here... 8) The DRL on focus is quite dim, or may be the angle is directed towards the floor, cause I can hardly make out the DRL in focus, even in the night... 9) The parking assist is awesome, although I hav only tried it in a wide parking space, since I couldnt find a space thats narrow enough... but the focus parks the car nicely in the spot... but also, I hav asked the SA regarding the parking assist, he honestly told me most drivers used the parking assist is only 20% of the time, cause it wont be able to detect parking space thats too narrow (esp in m'sia) and which comes to my main point, the front and rear parking sensors do come in handy 10) this is my personal preference, I dont like the handbrake design in focus, it feels like the break is pulled out of the central console next to the gear shift, worst design ever ( for me) Those above few points, are the few things I observed when I test drove both cars, these are my views.. Gud luck My mom have 3 cars in mind to change her current Civic now. Focus Titanium+, K5 and Passat Sport Focus, test drove 2 times. The SA doesnt seem to know much about the car, the SC looks horrible. The interior space is so cramped. The interior colour gets dirty easily. The steering leather feels rough. No resale value K5 - mom say its too big, high fuel consumption. And she watched the video on YouTube on some guys rattle issues with his K5. Also no resale value.. Passat Sport - went to showroom at Jalan Ampang, no SA even bothered to attend to us.. |
|
|
Oct 22 2012, 10:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,848 posts Joined: Dec 2009 From: Ampang |
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Oct 22 2012, 10:21 PM) Aspects which the K5 has an advantage over the Focus: In the city, I think the ford focus will be more fuel efficient than the K51) Being a D segment, the K5 offers much more interior & boot space 2) Exterior design (subjective) 3) The K5 has a higher NHTSA safety rating compared to the Focus (4 stars) 4) Unlimited mileage warranty Not very major factors but still factors nevertheless. |
|
|
Oct 22 2012, 11:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,848 posts Joined: Dec 2009 From: Ampang |
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Oct 22 2012, 10:31 PM) All 3 cars wont have good resale value. So why bother comparing a limiting factor that all 3 cars share? Were looking for something that wont give us problems. Once in a while can lah, but not the cars that needs to send to SC 2 times a month.. (got a pug that have build quality issues already at home, rattling and squeaking), How do u know the K5 has high fuel consumption? Did you check it out yourself? Ive managed to travel 780km on 80L of fuel with 80% highway at 160-170kmph. The remaining 20% in stop start KL traffic. This is considered quite good considering that the K5 is actually underpowered for its body weight. Are you trying to look for the perfect car then? Sadly, u aint gonna find it. You have access to the internet. Do some research on the various problems which have plagued ALL car manufacturers in the world. The Focus itself has faced 2 recalls in the America this year alone. But does that make it a bad car? Surely not. What about the millions of Toyotas which were recalled a number of times in the past few years. So is Toyota crap too? In 2010, Ferrari issued a wordwide recall of its brand new 458 Italia after a number of these cars caught fire at various locations around the world. How does this compare with some Youtube video about a rattling issue? So are you gonna say Ferrari's are crap too? If these are your criteria's in choosing a car, then your mum's best bet would be the public transport. Added on October 22, 2012, 10:33 pm Surely. Much lighter car. And we rarely travel outside of KL. so yeah, fc is gonna be bad. Mom's current civic gets around 9.7l/100km in city drive.. This post has been edited by Boy96: Oct 22 2012, 11:52 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0436sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 09:54 AM |