Mar 15 2014, 05:43 PM
QUOTE(derravile @ Mar 14 2014, 02:20 PM)
i doubt they will have more accessories than us at the same price
the reason is, i was waiting for my SA in showroom few days back, i have a look a m6, the m6 2.0 is really a basic unit (no nav, 17" rims, no sunroof, no bi-xenon hl, no paddle shift, no keyless entry and i-eloop) as compare to m3
extra features they had (leather seats, reverse camera, few more cant rmb)
if they include more accessories for m3, think will affect m6 sales, considering the price gap is not huge
imo, given the budget of m6 2.0, i would rather go for m3
Different segment btw Mazda 3 and 6. Its mirror with each other too much thus I see Mazda 3, the smaller version looks lesser solid than itself after Mazda 6 was existence on the road. the reason is, i was waiting for my SA in showroom few days back, i have a look a m6, the m6 2.0 is really a basic unit (no nav, 17" rims, no sunroof, no bi-xenon hl, no paddle shift, no keyless entry and i-eloop) as compare to m3
extra features they had (leather seats, reverse camera, few more cant rmb)
if they include more accessories for m3, think will affect m6 sales, considering the price gap is not huge
imo, given the budget of m6 2.0, i would rather go for m3
Agree that Mazda 6 should enhance more accessories for 2.0 version compare to 2.5 version esp i-eloop or bi xenon head lights.
But as I compare both, 17" rim is not big issue where it can be change to 18" or 19", same goes to Bi Xenon HL but sunroof, paddle shift is always not necessary for me.
For Mazda 3, I think they should give more range to choose from and wonder at such price, they given fabric seat.
Quote
0.0376sec
1.11
7 queries
GZIP Disabled