Random question from my cousin few days back:

"What would you choose between Nokia 808 vs Sony Nex F3?"
P.S: They're currently priced at RM1699 though.



Nokia has made this pity soul's life tough because of this beast..eh

Actually ya, it's like comparing orange and apple :s

May I know why should he opt for Nex f3 if his budget were to increase in following months please? Because needed for maintenance and lenses?

My guess is.. next year will be his sister's wedding, so he might wan to take some good photographs, but at the same time pocketability is important since he will also be busy entertaining guests and relatives, kinda fussy eh :S

This post has been edited by AlOnE89: Oct 22 2012, 10:30 PM

I think RX100 does support RAW file right? O.o
Just that they might need to convert it into another format to edit with photoshop (not too sure of that )
I wonder if pureview phase 3 will be raw format, that will be awesome lolololololol

True. I got many friends keeping their big gun at home, they only bring it out on big festive season, and collecting dust most of the time
Well.. I guess I might convince him to get Nokia 808 first and only consider about "true camera" later, it's also good to save more and aim for better big gun, and tbh.. he doesn't look like the one that willing to bring big guns all the time -.-

Nokia had/had been raped by many stubborn ceo, that's the cause if their downfall
They're like: we don't want to be too mainstream, so we will go the dead ended way, and we shall succeed with our sky high reputation!

That's what tarnished the brand,derp.

Lol now only aware of so many typos from my previous post,i hate typing on phone -.-

I think even IF WP8 turned out being successful, they will still unable to catch back throne of phone industry since samsung also taking wp8 alongside with Android, how to compete lol

Android is quite refined now to be honest, and there comes "lime pie?" (the newest version of android to be announced on 29th oct).. they will get much more better :/
my bro and sis got their s3 and I'm kinda jealous, the games with superb graphics and apps that facilitate daily tasks (symbian and even WP platform still lacking far behind imo) kills me badly >.>

I think we might finally be able to take android as great symbian replacement in current state; some might argue that symbian runs smoothly on single core and having good battery life, etc,. but imo...
does it even matter anymore especially note2 has now proven superb multitasking and great battery life can be done on this power hogger OS?

as a Nokia fan, i can either pray for Nokia to adopt android after contract with microsoft ended or I shouldn't really trapped myself with brand of "nokia" anymore (hard earn money need to spend more wisely eh)

Sorry guys, quoted too much of post, so I decided to use spoiler

It has bluetooth file transfer, pay a visit on blogjack (HK based nokia fan blog), they posted two articles pertaining bluetooth file transfer
they basically demonstrated files transfer between android and WP, including contact, website and picture i guess

Hmmm this is weird, some review sites say photos (picture) are not able to transfer via bluetooth..
but wouldn't it redundant to make such restriction since they allowed users to transfer music (via xbox or bla bla bla? effing microsoft making things so confuse)._.?

WP seem like a good iOS replacement, but just for those non-apps-zombies i guess,most ios users doesn't care about flexibility or being closed source, what they care are "able to show off their newest latest apps" to the others, so WP couldn't even fill up their teeth's gap lol
I guess for now, WP's target market are those pre-blackberry users/corporates (that can't wait for BB10), diehard nokians (how many of them left we wouldn't know lol), and stalkers (ftw!) lololololol
Apps redefined smartphone industry, so WP is nothing without them regardless it's well refurbished "iOS"

True, many people will try to argue that some features are not mandatory/ this and that, but they couldn't deny the fact that something useless for them might be useful for others,they're like "ok i'm ur dad, when i say useless, then just no and shut your pomegranate up cuz it's useless". We need some features that are practical and useful when needed, not that we gonna lost piece of meat for using it. But on the other hand, feature like so called wireless charging from Nokia is kind of useless to me or dare I say to majority of buyers, cuz who the heck will plug in the wireless charging stand and on it for 24/7? manyak energy waste weii :s
I wouldn't mind if they take this feature away and keep the phone slightly slimmer or lighter, until they enable true wireless charging that you need not to "bound" your phone on top of the charging pad to charge; at this point, charging via usb cable still more practical to me cuz we can pick it up while cable is attached, but it's stupid if we need now to carry along the charging pad just to play with the phone while it charge ._.

Sigh, even though we discussed this many times already, I still couldn't help but feel depress on this.
"What if" Nokia went Maemo full heartedly? they must still being top dog in smatphone industry..
Maemo is piece of combination from art, sceience, future (and whatever you can name it), it's just too.. legendary. Stupid Nokia is stupid, highe management should responsible for this.. bunch of worthless braindead zombies :/

This post has been edited by AlOnE89: Oct 31 2012, 11:43 PM

yellow 808? such variant exist? O.o