» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Well, you have a point definitely. And Apple did get their record-breaking ip5 sales right?
What i'm implying is that they have a whole year round to manufacture the Iphone and to stock up, yet around the world consumers are facing a serious shortage of iPhones. The iPhone isn't a piece of pie coming out from a bakery whereby the baker is unable to keep stock. I believe Apple would already have developed further generations of iPhones and they would not give themselves such a short time frame to manufacture the products. Although i'm not entirely dismissing the fact that they are indeed out of stock.
To generate news that you have more demand than supply would be greater than news mentioning that there are still a lot of stock. And what's not to believe that Apple would do this? Subliminal marketing has been one of their competitive edge.
I still think they would have known that this is coming, Also, IMO speculation on the profit and etc would be good for their shares.
Well, you do have some valid points. But remember though that they just barely broke their previous first-week record, significantly far below expectation due to supply constraint. And that was also due to the fact that Apple wasn't counting unshipped preorders as numbers that concluded their third quarter (lost oppurtunities there). So if you can see what I'm implying, that alone is a bad news for AAPL shares. So obviously, artificially constricting the sales is the very last thing they wanna do. Speculation does damage in this very situation.
Yes, iPhone isn't something that came out from a bakery. But still, it came out from a production line. And with any production line in the world, there are always bottlenecks that do limit their daily production. And eventhough they do manufacture them everyday, it's not like they do ship them to all countries on daily basis. They're not our local bakery. They do have to cater demands by telcos (mostly) from around the world, so taking turns they are (with some exception of course).
Yes, it should be a normal practice for any tech company to have developed further generations in the pipeline. But remember though...
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
...from prototyping, entering EVT, DVT, testing for network interoperability (at least with US telcos), do take a long time. And developing an SoC based from a reference design alone conservatively takes around 2 years. The ones in Apple A6 is a custom design unlike Cortex A9 or A15, while targeting the key features of Cortex A15 like what Qualcomm does with Snapdragon-A9 compatibility. So obviously, development of iPhone 5 started waay back too far earlier.
Long story short, yup, they're supposed to be developing another following product in the meantime, but that's due to the time taken until the design is finalised is very long.
Subliminal messaging? I'd say the phone itself does a good job, without the need of faking its demand-supply situation that only gonna further damaging their stock price. Plus if you want me to swallow that, you'd have to make yourself accept that Sammy are also doing the very same practice that their shipments of their initial S3 stocks for the first months falls short of their own estimate due to the very same excuse as Apple's.
Before you've mistaken me that I'm just bringing Samsung-Apple adversary into this one, then I'm saying that I'm not. I'm just proving a point that even with Samsung being the first-party manufacturer of their own flagship S3, from fabricating the processors to the displays, they too stumbled with this tight-supply situation. And viewing from a different perspective, I'd say that Apple managed this far with ginormous devices delivered from launch is actually some incredible feat though.
btw, back to this thread's topic, seems like there's no news regarding this so-called 19 Oct date. Well, if there's still nothing on monday newspaper then that rumour can be discarded already. Sure gonna break many hearts, including mine