QUOTE(InfiniteVoid @ Feb 17 2006, 09:32 AM)
Well, I wouldn't agree with you. Animals are innocent but not human. I would rather avoid an animal and knock the motorcyclist instead. There are a few reason why I do so...
1.) I can repay back if it is not a serious accident.
2.) If that accident involve life, I still can repay my sin in the jail.
3.) Human is the worst...
What if the fact is turn the other way round...
I ran through the animal, I don't care and I got through with it. I sin a lot that cannot repay. I would turn up to be the worst idiot!
He said that the animal already got knocked down and is gona die anyway so it won't make much diff if u hit it again or not, wud probably be better if u kill it off on the spot so it won't have to suffer more. 1.) I can repay back if it is not a serious accident.
2.) If that accident involve life, I still can repay my sin in the jail.
3.) Human is the worst...
What if the fact is turn the other way round...
I ran through the animal, I don't care and I got through with it. I sin a lot that cannot repay. I would turn up to be the worst idiot!
The motorist that u may knock down cud be innocent as well, and is probably alot less likely to die anytime sooner than that animal. Ever thought of wat wud happen if the motorist had a family to feed? what if there were kids onboard? are u saying that a human life or more are worth less than a half-dead dog/cat on the road? what if u get jailed, ur fam wud be worried sick and u will suffer alot, do u really have the guts to do it or are u just all talk?
not saying that u are wrong cz im noe u dont wana hear that, jz wondering if u ever thought about stuff like that.
my thoughts:
-u must be a sadist if u'd let a suffering animal that's gona die anyway suffer longer
-u must be even more sadistic to risk someone elses life or a few ppls' lives just so u can let a suffering animal that's gona die anyway suffer longer
Feb 18 2006, 09:42 AM

Quote
0.0165sec
0.58
6 queries
GZIP Disabled