QUOTE(Intermission @ Sep 19 2012, 09:29 PM)
Hi to all professors and doctors out there,
I am a SPM 2013 candidate. After SPM, I intend to continue with A levels and subscribe to one of the scientific journals, Nature or Science for personal improvement. In your opinion, which of the 2 is more suitable for the college students like me?
From what I could gather, their publications don't overlap with each other and that most people say that both are equally good and important. I also heard that one of them(can't really remember which, maybe Science) is leaned towards biological sciences. My interests are mainly Physics, mathematics and chemistry and that I am interested in engineering, so which is better for me?
I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to post this question.
Neither a professor nor a doctor, but I have some questions for you:I am a SPM 2013 candidate. After SPM, I intend to continue with A levels and subscribe to one of the scientific journals, Nature or Science for personal improvement. In your opinion, which of the 2 is more suitable for the college students like me?
From what I could gather, their publications don't overlap with each other and that most people say that both are equally good and important. I also heard that one of them(can't really remember which, maybe Science) is leaned towards biological sciences. My interests are mainly Physics, mathematics and chemistry and that I am interested in engineering, so which is better for me?
I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to post this question.
1) What is the nature of your 'personal improvement'? You state that you are interested in so many things- that can be a problem because it's not easy reading scientific journals if you don't have the training to dissect, understand and analyze them. This can only come from a uni class tutorial or you find someone in uni to guide you through the jargon. Also, people with years of experience reading lengthy papers don't particularly find them appealing.
2) There are plenty of free journal abstracts/summaries available (Science Direct comes to mind) which have easily digestible information for the layman- they're basically news updates that do the dissecting and summarizing of journals for you.
3) Scientific journals are specialized and people usually read them if they're doing research because they need to cite them in their research. For the casual reader, it's not exactly worth a journal subscription (because they are VERY expensive) unless you know what you're doing and you need to know the details of the research, such as you're an academic looking to keep abreast of the latest research in whatever area of your specialization.
4) "Most people say they're good"- as a scientist (to be or whatever), you're advised to analyze statements like that. What is the nature of this "good"? As opposed to what? How is it 'important'?
Sep 24 2012, 10:08 PM

Quote
0.0153sec
0.73
6 queries
GZIP Disabled