Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Basic Intake and Exhaust Modification Guide, for normal aspirated cars v1.0

views
     
farique
post May 31 2006, 10:57 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(soggie @ May 31 2006, 09:02 AM)
If you do not have a turbo, then there's no point putting in a mis-firing system. If I were you i would spend that extra money (and the money saved from NOT destroying your exhaust system every month) on actual performance upgrades. But since you asked, there're a few ways to do it - an ECU upgrade or get this gadget called flame dragon.
*
what he really meant by his question is, how can I get the misfiring effect?
dat is by installing the kit you mentioned..
he already know that the misfiring originally can happen on turbocharged engine.

oh yea, you can use the qoute button to qoute 2 post in 1 posting.

This post has been edited by farique: May 31 2006, 10:58 AM
farique
post Jul 9 2006, 12:37 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(x800 @ Jul 6 2006, 12:49 AM)
I was wondering if there is anything i can do to make the noise sound like stock again, while keeping (or better, increasing) my car's power?
*
u removed the CAT?.. which means u running on direct pipe? exhaust modification is like trial and error cant really predect which is the best. My fren uses 3 muffler/bullet after the extractor and its sound just nice.. with added sport muffler tip, the sound gets sexier.. its just a Kelisa 1.0.. size of the piping, cant really remember.. i think its just slightly larger than stock Kelisa 1.0 pipe..
farique
post Aug 4 2006, 07:48 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
guys, what do you think of this setup for my 1.0 A Kelisa.
-3-2-1 exhaust manifold
-1.8" piping from exhaust manifold through 1 centre bullet until the muffler
-using original piping route

what do you guys think? shall I decrease the size of the piping? what a good decent muffler brand that really recude the noise?

Thanks. smile.gif
farique
post Aug 5 2006, 09:56 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE
guys, what do you think of this setup for my 1.0 A Kelisa.
-3-2-1 exhaust manifold
-1.8" piping from exhaust manifold through 1 centre bullet until the muffler
-using original piping route

what do you guys think? shall I decrease the size of the piping? what a good decent muffler brand that really recude the noise?

Thanks. smile.gif
*
any comment? smile.gif
farique
post Aug 6 2006, 10:30 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(crazeeclan @ Aug 5 2006, 10:08 AM)
wut i think is u need to reduce the size of ur kelisa piping la...1.8"is way to big....im driving a 1.3 carb using 1.5 piston size and block and im using only 1.7" only.....my setup...cap ayam 4-2-1 extractor...twisted hotbits bullet...datco muffler...1.7" s flow route piping....power...low rev ok ok...not bad.....high rev can feel more kick in....
*
yea.. its kinda big. how about going for 1.6"? i think its already nice? u are using original piping route right? Datco muffler? is it those N1 type or the big² size type?
hows the sound of the exhaust? loud?
I dont want loud sound and wondering if there is any good muffler. Not the N1 type..

QUOTE(m|ng @ Aug 5 2006, 11:18 PM)
What effect does changing the bullet have?
Was recomended to change that if I want a 'cheap and good' performance increase in my car.  If so, what size of a bullet to change to?  notworthy.gif
*
bullets have sizes?
farique
post Aug 16 2006, 08:30 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(sledgehammer @ Aug 15 2006, 07:33 PM)
icic.... what is the beauty side of this exhaust ?
*
ofcourse for increasing performance.. BUT, if u dont know nothing about ur engine, dont ever think of doing it. If ur engine still a stock standard without any modification, dont every try to do it or you'll end up lossing power and super high fuel consumption.

this setup also called as direct pipe setup.
farique
post Aug 16 2006, 02:27 PM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(sledgehammer @ Aug 16 2006, 08:44 AM)
i saw R3 MME waja manual is using this type of exhaust....  smile.gif

but they nvr mentioned it's performance...
but since it is a direct piping, this exhaust setup is suitable for manual only izzit?
*
yes, should be for cars with manual transmission. Cars that mostly uses this kind of setup are those with VTEC engine and those forced fed cars..
farique
post Aug 25 2007, 08:03 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(cloudstrife07 @ Aug 25 2007, 07:00 AM)
wanna ask, for a Nissan Langley sedan with engine E15T 1.5 turbo, which setup is better? 4-2-1 or 4-1?or it doesnt matter, just according to my driving style?
i just got the car from my uncle, and im completely clueless about turbos and nissans sweat.gif
*
how could you choose between 4-2-1 or 4-1 while you have turbo? laugh.gif

seriously, have you checked the engine bay itself? and imgine how would you want to fit that 4-2-1 or 4-1 headers later? laugh.gif
farique
post Aug 25 2007, 08:14 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(cloudstrife07 @ Aug 25 2007, 08:06 AM)
hehe, thats y i told u i had no idea about turbos and nissan cars laugh.gif

i just received the car, and due to the time constraints of my studies, assignments etc, (right now oso doing unfinished assignments) i was unable to completely "study" the car yet.so im just guessing it based on my dad's Saga LMST tongue.gif

edit: i just saw the sub-title "for normally-aspirated car"  doh.gif guess my question is not valid eh..
*
urm.. not really not valid. Its just not quite reasonable. laugh.gif

For turbocharged cars, there is a turbine that being stuck there at the exhaust manifold. The turbo runs by the gases that coming out from the engine. Basically, the setup is like this:

[4]-[turbo]-[1]

laugh.gif
farique
post Apr 15 2008, 09:52 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
gohlex, follow what sky said. nod.gif
farique
post Oct 23 2008, 07:21 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
anyone does Y-pipe?


QUOTE(shazwan89 @ Oct 23 2008, 04:38 AM)
hey guys..im driving gen-2 1.6(A) with standard campro engine unde the hood..so far i have decat and change stock muffler to s-flow one..i want to ask suggestion from u guys..what should i do on extractor,bullet, and piping..my aim is low-end to mid-end as campro have problem with that..any suggestion?any comment about kweng exhaust?and is it worth if i get R3 extractor?(RM300++) from friend
*
what makes you think the oem muffler wasn't an s-flow type? laugh.gif

extractor = 4-2-1
bullets = minimum 0, max 1 (no need bullet la.. waste money oni. You got end muffler already)
pipe = oem still can or a lil bit larger. Maybe 2"? brows.gif

as long as it is an oem R3 parts, you can rest assured it is well spent. nod.gif
farique
post Oct 23 2008, 09:23 PM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(shazwan89 @ Oct 23 2008, 01:53 PM)
hihi sorry bro..i didnt mean the OEM muffler is not airflow..what i mean is i change it to a better and bigger tip s-flow muffler..  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  ..2" pipng is it too big for auto car?and any idea how much if i do piping at R3?and one more..what about the stock bullet?iff add bullet.means stock one all remove eh?
*
auto eh? maybe stick to oem piping I guess.

Cuz, I've seen mostly 1.6 vtecs and 1.6 mivecs uses 2.0" pipe and end with straight-flow muffler or S-flow muffler. And mostly, they are manuals. tongue.gif

bullet ah? I dont think need to add bullet la. Since stock system already has a bullet (catlytic converter). But if you think the muffler isn't muffled enough, add one bullet to reduce the noise.


but for me la, I'd go with mandrel bent exhaust manifold, and 2" pipe (using original route) and end with any good s-flow muffler. No bullets. brows.gif




 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0415sec    0.79    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 06:44 PM