Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Thoughts on 16:10 vs. 16:9 Monitors, Opinion

views
     
imbibug
post Jan 15 2014, 10:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,697 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


16:10 is not coming back into the mainstream 1080 monitors because 16:9 shares the same aspect ratio as HD tvs and is cheaper due to economy of scale. 16:10 has a chance with 4k standards but I doubt I'm going to get a 4k monitor even if I could afford it, its going to be too big.
imbibug
post Jan 15 2014, 02:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,697 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(wildwestgoh @ Jan 15 2014, 10:47 AM)
4K is now labelled as 3840x2160 (1080 x 2 = 2160) so it's still 16:9.
16:10 probably only available for professional IPS panel for the high-end, guess consumer who's looking for value monitor with 16:10 will just need to swallow their breath for now (holding for future possibility is not healthy rclxub.gif ).
I was looking for 16:10 as well, but the price point still a deal breaker...  doh.gif sigh~
*
Yes its more than likely that computer monitors will keep following hd tv standards at 4k/8k instead of 16:10 whxga.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_size
A 16:9 22" (or 21.5") led monitor only has the vertical height of a 17" 4:3 crt monitor. So for someone who was used to the 21" crt monitor, its going to take a 24" 16:10 led monitor or 26" 16:9 led monitor to have the same vertical height.

imbibug
post Jan 18 2014, 11:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,697 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(chopin @ Jan 18 2014, 11:30 AM)
yeah, agreed. mons with 16:9 ratio will have to be at least 26" to match the height of a 16:10 24" mon, and the price would be too high for average users.  mad.gif

Actually manufacturers can go ahead to make 29" or larger mons for all I care, but they would be useless for work if the vertical reso is only limited at 1080 - it is too short to be productive - what a waste! From two years ago, my minimum requirement for a new mon is that its height must be at least same or more than the height of an A4 paper - 11.66".
*
I don't find 1080 to be bad. I prefer the size savings over the crt, but I don't have to work full time with life size documents and can make do will scaled down sizes.

For office workers who need vertical size for document editing they can either stick with their old 4:3 crt monitors or change their led monitors to portrait mode. Get a dual led monitor set up (portrait+landscape).

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0161sec    0.45    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 03:06 AM