Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Singapore REITS, S-REITS

views
     
TSprophetjul
post Jul 25 2024, 08:58 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,267 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(TOS @ Jul 25 2024, 12:07 AM)
As expected, the REIT lobbyists complained to cheng hu to help laugh.gif

MAS proposes simplified leverage requirements for S-Reits, imposes minimum ICR threshold of 1.5 times

https://www.straitstimes.com/business/mas-p...old-of-15-times

40 to 45 and now 50%... the funny thing is they still think “A leverage limit of 50 per cent, together with the ICR floor, will continue to foster prudent borrowing by Reits,” said the authority.
*
So what do you think should be the governing matrices?
TSprophetjul
post Jul 25 2024, 01:21 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,267 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(TOS @ Jul 25 2024, 11:08 AM)
Internalization is one way. And it has to be done right from the start, not sponsor throwing in properties they wanna offload to reduce their own leverage or save themselves.


*
Think this is not possible. Without sponsors, how are you going to create the financial stable of properties for listing as an Reit?
Like it or not, Reits are vehicles for sponsors to monetise their assets and we as minorities have a share in the rentals of such properties.

TSprophetjul
post Jul 27 2024, 10:26 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,267 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(TOS @ Jul 26 2024, 10:57 PM)
Do a critique on KIT.
Thanks tongue.gif
TSprophetjul
post Aug 28 2024, 06:10 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,267 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(TOS @ Aug 27 2024, 05:44 PM)
Oui, long time no see uncle biggrin.gif

I checked my DBS SG account, hmmm, haven't seen your payments yet...  laugh.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


KIT has been losing money for some time... they are not earning enough to offset the expenses.

user posted image

Still an old, free advice, stick to S-banks. Tried and tested. Been through multiple crises, kiasu kiasi Sporeans aren't gonna start shifting cash to CIMB and Maybank SG overnight... even with the frequent service disruptions and IT issues... they remain "patriotic" and perform their "national service" laugh.gif

We shareholders just "count the cash" and "follow the money".
*
Understand utilities with fixed term contracts.
The "loss" is normally because of depreciation/amortisation provision numbers ov er those contract periods.
However, these type of business trusts depends on cashflows to give out dividends.

But yeah, i don't like the increase in the manager's fees.

This post has been edited by prophetjul: Aug 28 2024, 06:11 AM
TSprophetjul
post Aug 31 2024, 08:22 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,267 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(Hansel @ Aug 30 2024, 05:30 PM)
Thank you, TOS,... and pls don't call me uncle,... I help out in the war and I may be able to run faster than you,... smile.gif

KIT perf fee is pegged increase in dividend y-o-y, and there is a formula to calculate this. But if the dpu stay constant or drops, there is no perf fee, that's all. Base fee still goes as normal. They call this as 'aligned to unitholders' interest' since unitholders are for more and more dpu payouts.

I saw that they paid out dpu for 1H FY2024 based on a 'jacked-up' DI instead of the actual DI that they generated. For 1Q FY2024 DI, they too talked abt one-offs and some revenue not collected 'YET' because of timing diff's.... If KIT's mgmt keeps talking like this,... it looks dangerous to me.....

Secondly,... I saw all of the assets contributed LOWER DI year-on-year from the DI report. And then the mgmt said again,... this is because of many one-offs.

Thirdly, in the webcast call recently for 1H FY2024 reporting, the way one of them answered questions, it was so 'dodgy' and defensive.

I have 'replaced' 50% of my KIT's allocation with Boustead SG Ltd.
*
QUOTE
The lower 1H 2024 DI is largely due to timing differences as well as one-offs. Factoring in these differences to better reflect underlying operational performance, 1H 2024 adjusted DI would be $117.8 million2, 2.1% higher YoY against 1H 2023 adjusted DI of $115.4 million3


2 1H 2024 DI would be $117.8 million after adjusting for performance fees ($13 million), growth capex ($8.9 million) and upfront financing fee ($6.5 million) net of base fees.

3 1H 2023 DI would be $115.4 million after adjusting for BKR2 debt amortisation ($22.4 million), upfront financing fee (S$2.2 million) and growth capex of ($0.7 million) net of base fees.

Let's see whether this is adjusted in H2.
TSprophetjul
post Oct 29 2024, 06:53 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,267 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

Starhill Q1 updates

https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/SGREIT%20Ext...t&FileID=823408
TSprophetjul
post May 20 2025, 11:00 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,267 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

Bro TOS got suspended?

73 Pages « < 71 72 73Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.3545sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 01:06 AM