QUOTE(bo0t @ Nov 4 2012, 12:59 AM)
We deserved to be 3rd. At Start of season. . Many predicted the best we can get is third..don't hope so much, we are still far from winning material. .This post has been edited by Alexdino: Nov 4 2012, 01:07 AM
English Clubs Chelsea FC, BPL - Swansea 1 - 1 Chelsea
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 01:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(bo0t @ Nov 4 2012, 12:59 AM) We deserved to be 3rd. At Start of season. . Many predicted the best we can get is third..don't hope so much, we are still far from winning material. .This post has been edited by Alexdino: Nov 4 2012, 01:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 01:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 10:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 06:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 08:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(SGSuser @ Nov 4 2012, 07:58 PM) i find no reason for me not to reply a person who quoted me asking if im stupid, and instead of taking actions on mild offenses like this please do start first with the serious ones like the one who admitted to creating an account just to create chaos you are saying mod are not doing their job? instead of going after you? |
|
|
Nov 5 2012, 11:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 10:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(Ichighost @ Nov 6 2012, 09:16 AM) Chelsea are going cold on Atletico Madrid hitman Radamel Falcao - because Roman Abramovich is no longer convinced the Colombian is worth his asking price. if really need to buy, buy someone prolific enough..if not better dont buy. But with Abramovich retaining faith in Fernando Torres despite his lack of goals, the Chelsea owner is now signalling he is less than keen on meeting Atletico's £46million price for the South American. Marseilles' France striker Loic Remy, who was on the Chelsea radar at the close of the summer window, is now understood to be back on the agenda, with the £15m tag not seen as too onerous. And the other potential target is Falcao's fellow Colombian, Porto's Jackson Martinez, who has scored nine in as many league appearances - and 14 in all competitions - for the Portuguese side since his £8m arrival from Jaguares, beating the club records set by Falcao and Brazilian Hulk. |
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 10:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#88
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(Ichighost @ Nov 6 2012, 10:22 AM) gamble? if you really gamble? we dont aim small price if gamble, gamble we want to win big.. please we dont need another "drogba".. we need another player of their own.. stop taking up drogba name everytime you try to buy a striker, and name it 'drogba the 2nd", no one will come January buy is always "hesitation" buy meaning we need someone to perform as soon as he come..not to buy someone to build for future..might as well wait till june.. |
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 11:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(Ichighost @ Nov 6 2012, 11:01 AM) yap..we gamble big twice now..both flop.. basically they are 2 type of buy, buy for now, buy for future,lol..we already buy drogba. no2..hahaha lukaku ! i prefer to use lukaku than buy falcao.. i understand the impact signing usually signed during the winter transfer window..but other than expensive falcao i dont see many other player... you cant always buy for future, you look like arsenal, their policy, where are their player whenever they train a player from 'buy for future' to 'buy for now'? i think we have enough the "buy for future", we are clearly lack of firing power up front, see MU, Mcity.. and in term of man management, if you buy no-body, and play him instead of torres, if this no-body wont perform, do you think torres will settle with this? RDM will get into trouble with Torres and even roman. if you buy big name, and play him instead of torres, if this big-name wont perform, at least you have excuses that even torres wont perform.. since they are equal in fame just give him more times the impact of big name is the "psychology-effect" he bring along. torres will wan to perform when it come to falcao in the team, rather than remy? martinez? sheva is not a "total" flop, at least he bring out the best of drogba.. don't be afraid of bring in big name, this is how we Chelsea do things Added on November 6, 2012, 11:29 am QUOTE(yinchet @ Nov 6 2012, 11:11 AM) our defense and pivot is big problem leaking early goal easily. that is another problem. recall essien? JM should be able to approve it? Mikel is good but lack off work late hope we can get the essien type player. perhaps. This post has been edited by Alexdino: Nov 6 2012, 11:29 AM |
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 12:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 12:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 01:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 01:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#93
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(Rhicebowl @ Nov 6 2012, 12:58 PM) Lol..mancity so many stars. You guys should look there la. If im rdm i would unsettle edin dzeko and get him over. dzeko is the most prolific, i dont think MC will let go.![]() ![]() ![]() Sos This post has been edited by Alexdino: Nov 6 2012, 01:11 PM |
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,006 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
![]() QUOTE The above graphic highlights that Cahill is 15% more effective (66% versus 51%) in terms of winning ground 50-50 balls. However, it should be noted that while Luiz has played nearly double the minutes of Cahill, he has been involved in nearly six times more ground 50-50 situations (173 to 35). In terms of aerial 50-50 balls, Cahill wins the ball 70% of the time, with Luiz winning them on only 58.5% of occasions. The pair is nearly identical in terms of tackling success. Luiz holds a slight edge at 87% to Cahill’s 86%. Luiz has about four times more interceptions than Cahill, while also being dribbled past five times more often. Amazingly, Cahill has not made a defensive error in his time on the pitch with Chelsea (a stretch of more than 14.5 full games), while Luiz has committed two such errors. Loss of possession statistics show that Luiz loses the ball about once per game (every 88 minutes), while Cahill goes 328.5 minutes on average without losing possession. ![]() QUOTE While there is no questioning John Terry’s place as captain and leader of The Blues, what’s certainly up for debate is who should be his partner in the centre of Chelsea’s defence. As mentioned, David Luiz appears to have a stranglehold on that position. However, this decision appears to be without merit. Gary Cahill is significantly more effective in nearly all defensive aspects of the game, winning 50-50 balls on both the ground and in the air at a greater rate than Luiz (15% more on the ground, 11.5% more in the air), while being dribbled past much less frequently. Additionally, Cahill loses possession less often and makes fewer defensive mistakes than Luiz. Although Luiz intercepts the ball more frequently, this is likely due to his over aggression; the same aggression that plays a large role in his ineffectiveness in other defensive areas. Moreover, Gary Cahill is a more accurate passer, completing an astonishing 88% of them, while also contributing more goals and converting a higher percentage of his chances than Luiz. make luiz a DM.. Sos |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0396sec
0.33
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 07:53 AM |