Nokia fans too disappointed with 920 camera bust up until accidentally clicked into Android forum?
Quad Core phones, is it really a must?, Galaxy S3 pawned by Sony Xperia? No?
|
|
 Sep 11 2012, 06:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2012, 07:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
QUOTE(aspire2oo6 @ Sep 11 2012, 04:32 PM) But s3 quad core consider as mobile phone highest processor it's like i7 not i3. You'll need to catch up on ARM architecture big time.Furthermore this i3, i5 and i7 real computer are customizable and upgradable. Your s3 is not so you can't really compare. If lag I can change the processor or add ram. For me I more concern on resell value. For desktop since its customizable and upgradable I will get a spec that can last me at least 5 years.  |
|
|
Sep 11 2012, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
QUOTE(aspire2oo6 @ Sep 11 2012, 07:03 PM) not really interested there many more stuff i need to focus in life rather than research on those things. Too technical. Then stop comparing it like 1+1=2. There's more underneath than just basic number.For me is usablity, stability, durability and most important camera. |
|
|
Sep 11 2012, 07:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
I think this stupid topic is the culprit. It was never a which phone pawn which phone based on just the benchmarks used to judge the SoC superiority used in different phones. There's more to it than just some number crunch. Besides those who compare dual core faster than quad core has no idea at all about ARM architecture.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0184sec
 0.36
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 11:07 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.