No more withholding tax for reits after Budget ?
REIT V4, Real Estate Investment Trust
REIT V4, Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
Sep 14 2012, 12:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
No more withholding tax for reits after Budget ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 4 2013, 11:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
No one talks about Yield Curve generally or something like that ?
I read in one of Maybank reports, apparently forgotten about it . To certain extent, it might impact the attractiveness of the reits. |
|
|
Jan 4 2013, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(prophetjul @ Jan 4 2013, 11:55 AM) if i may add why stock price/NAV is important for REITs. DPU could be affected ( lower in rare cases ) due to the vast depreciation in asset values, such as when the actual market values of properties dropping ways belong its book values.REITs normally have lots of borrowings. Their borrowings are given ratings based on their asset quality. IF IF there was an asset depreciation due to financial downturns etc, quality assets will be able to mitigate NAV depreciation better. When assets deprecaite and NAV is affected, so are their ratings. This brings up the costs of borrowings PLUS they may have to top up their risk profile for the borrowers as most borrowings are dependant on their NAV. It happens quite a number of times in HK, when the economies were really bad at times. Surprisingly, u may see only Revaluation Surpluses in MREIT so far ( correct me if I am wrong ). This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jan 4 2013, 12:27 PM |
|
|
Jan 18 2013, 12:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(yok70 @ Jan 18 2013, 09:47 AM) single-tier dividend means the number inclusive of tax. (meaning, already tax 25%! cannot even claim back) Do not know why people like to call Withholding Tax ( usually not a final tax until conditions are met ) as a Single Tier Tax ( final tax ) :-as for REIT, it's only 10%, less than ordinary stock's 25%. Please correct me if I am wrong. - Firstly REIT itself is tax free, whereas investors pay only 10% withholding tax ( on Div ) if conditions are met by REIT co ( usually ) , higher Div TAX if conditions unmet. - So where is the Single ( Tier ) Tax comes from ? as both are not taxed at the same rates ( aka co and investors' Dividend tax rate are at diff tiers ) ? - Only Time it is single tier when REIT itself has to pay 25% tax , and same rate applied to tax on dividends . Just curious only. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jan 18 2013, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Jan 18 2013, 02:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(gark @ Jan 18 2013, 12:59 PM) Normal dividend tax - tax is not payable at company level (tax credit given for dividend paid), but is taxed at individual level at 25%, can claim back on declaration of income tax. IF with Zero Risk, it is even better Single tier - Tax is payable at company level (on the total profit, no tax credit given), means the individual is not taxed again. On average corporate tax is 18%-22% depending on deductibles. Withholding tax (REIT) - means it is not taxed on company level (0% corporate tax as long as 90% payout) but 10% individual level & cannot claim back. Best is Singapore stocks... no capital gain tax, no dividend tax & no withholding tax. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jan 18 2013, 02:37 PM |
|
|
Apr 6 2013, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 01:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2013, 06:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(bleachzrockz @ Apr 9 2013, 06:31 PM) hi guys, i am newbie in reit..hope you can help Total DPS per unit u are supposed to rec :-Final income distribution of 4.24 sen per unit (of which 3.94 sen per unit is taxable and 0.30 sen per unit is tax exempt in the hands of unitholders) in respect of the period from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2012. what does this mean??meaning we only get 0.30sen per unit??3.94sen are all taxed??thank you very much!! 1) 0.3 sen in full ( without 10% tax ) 2) 3.94 sen less 10% tax ( net is 3.55 sen ) sum of 1 and 2. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Apr 9 2013, 06:51 PM |
|
|
Jun 1 2013, 12:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(river.sand @ Jun 1 2013, 09:05 AM) Regarding Starhill - does it actually run the hotels, or lease them to others? I thought reits are allowed to lease out properties, then engaging in trading or other unauthorized businesses . If it actually runs the hotels, then the income would depend on guest arrivals, which is not consistent... One thing the special tax of 10% ( or zero for reit company ) is for limited businesses/purposes, otherwise other listed companies would surely want to convert to reits . Other parts of the world may allow reits to construct properties but so far not available here. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 1 2013, 12:49 PM |
|
|
Jun 2 2013, 04:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(H86 @ Jun 2 2013, 02:22 PM) Those payables are usually not important to consider as liabilities because it is just normal for business that other people provided services 1st then only we pay to them. In fact , all balance sheet items are important, but when the amounts are relatively small, then could be considered as immaterial ( not significant enough ) .Short term debt, Current portion of long term debt, Long term debt should be the 3 bank loans that u need consider 1) But all payables are all tied to some credit terms, let say 30, 60 , 90 days. Once over these periods, creditors have rights to take legal actions, so becoming material and important. 2) Well if the credit terms given are longer, then the costs of goods purchased tend to be more expensive than let say on cash terms 3) Big Payables may result in net overall current liability , hence under scoring under some bank facilities . 4) A grossly under working capital from large payables could result from past losses and under capitalized of a company .... 5) etc etc like under the radar for more checking n queries by the auditors Just to show the important ness of Payables. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 2 2013, 04:23 PM |
|
|
Jun 2 2013, 06:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(H86 @ Jun 2 2013, 04:57 PM) I know payables are debt but is it really so important in REIT? We would be seeing the REIT unable to get rent by unable to rent out 1st then only need to worry about payables. Payables are expenses and we surely have "Receivables" in the account too. Well , there were not so serious cases in Mreits where one whole office block /building was not rented out for a year , and another reit having millions of rental outstanding ( one big tenant did not pay ) .As u know well, reits depend strongly on banks to support for loans to be used as working capitals, some levels of " performance acceptance " needed or else banks may just pull back the bank loans. Failed reits did happen in overseas and even in Singapore some faced bad financial situations. Most people I guess bought reits in recent booming period, so they have the " safest and impossible " mindsets. Not meant to scare u also, some say history has its place and worth in one way or another. I agree. Happy investing. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 2 2013, 07:21 PM |
|
|
Jun 3 2013, 11:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Jun 3 2013, 10:38 PM) Can't blame the entire on the complacency part. Well Said Just like now, we always hear people said, die die also must own at least a property, as property price only escalating and won't drop one. As many may not experience before 1. how bad it can be holding a property that cannot be rented out, while need to pay monthly commitment. <-- it is a big liabilities if the property is doing nothing. Even if rented out, collecting rent may not as "smooth" as many think. 2. properties price dropping instead rising. 3. abandoned property project Nowadays, with property price so high, and maintenance cost of the property is expensive, rent is not entirely a bad idea. I always disagree most people said that rent a house is bad, must own the property. But many forget there are plenty of commitment and liabilities by owning a property. If rent can improve cashflow of personal financial management, then rent can be a good choice, instead having big commitment by owning a property, and every month struggling to pay the bill after commit too much on house loan repayment. Totally agree with renting first which is still cheap and affordable . BTW , IMF and experts say many Asian countries and BRIC did not make full use of cheap money from QEs to become High Income Nations. Most countries would just use the easy credits to pile up debt levels and hence face a serious middle income trap . " The worries about a middle-income trap extend beyond the BRICs. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned in April about such dangers for the entire Asian region Inits "Regional Economic Outlook", the IMF said the region must liberalize its labor markets and improve government institutions in order to achieve the economic level of developed nations." "There is a growing risk that BRIC markets, along with other emerging economic, fall into the middle income trap. Cheap cash breeds complacency and record low interest rates and soaring capital inflows have pumped up growth in the emerging market world,while structural reforms have lagged behind," Frederic Neumann, co-head of Asian economic and global research at HSBC told CNBC. BRIC Powerhouses Risk 'Middle-Income Growth Trap' http://www.cnbc.com/id/100783568 http://greaterkl.bernama.com/excnews.php?id=560755 Happy Reading. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 4 2013, 12:07 AM |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
Some how the quality of management deteriorated, management acts without the concern or the feeling of the Ikan Bilis .
This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 14 2013, 02:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 05:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(davinz18 @ Jun 14 2013, 04:57 PM) Even they own majority, We as minority also have right attend & vote at EGM. In the meeting, we hentam kaw2 at the management until need to call Polis bantuan IF under RPTs, those shareholders have interests in reits called related parties cannot vote in the land deals .Somehow deals still approved in the end by some magic ...... |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 05:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(davinz18 @ Jun 14 2013, 05:23 PM) Got the feeling the major shareholders hold more than "officially" listed. Using the good old method of using other people name to hold shares same feeling too......But Ikan Bilis are scared to ask too high end Q besides the DPU thing. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 14 2013, 05:50 PM |
|
|
Jun 15 2013, 12:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(majorarmstrong @ Jun 15 2013, 01:24 AM) broker say nothing is wrong and YTL so big why worry... i ask him about the delay payment, he say he dont have any inside news but most of his clients are still holding except me who let go and say i stupid Cannot really say YTL is good or not good .basically he got nothing to share with me.. anyway REITS are pretty stable counter if you want to hold just go ahead nothing wrong just that i am giving up all my REITS as the DY is dropping from year to year bit capital appreciation make up for the low DY just that i dont like anything below 8% as i am the type that take the money and reinvest back into the shares to keep it snowball when the DY is as low as 4.xx% it is really disappointing! Maybe put FD got special rate with 4.1% if you have > RMx you will get so you have to understand why i am looking at 8% yield minimum. buy also need pay brokerage sell also pay brokerage if you get 4% is not worth the risk if the market collapse where you will suffer capital loss lo... anyway today i have release almost 60% of my REITS left with only AR & SUN & KLCC... most likely will let go as well. all got capital gain the only one i might keep is AR saja... even my PAV also i sell today lo sell while green!! Just that YTL is going lot of portfolio reshuffling ..........here and there . But being a minor shareholder yourself , more disadvantageous than advantageous in many ways. I.e What is good to YTL, may not be good to small timers due to portfolio reshuffling. So find your own acceptance level. Anyway, judge your own. Good luck in Investing. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 15 2013, 01:07 PM |
|
|
Jun 15 2013, 04:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(majorarmstrong @ Jun 15 2013, 01:28 PM) i am still in discovery mode to find 7% to 8% DY but chances are pretty slim If u are patient enough, chances of reit yield falling back to 7% are there.monday if continue green will sell all my REITS and be REITS free It is just a matter of time , depending whether time in on your side. Meanwhile u can observe how sreit s fall to get a feel of what I say ........ This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jun 15 2013, 04:20 PM |
|
|
Jun 24 2013, 05:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 28 2013, 05:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(felixmask @ Jun 28 2013, 05:03 PM) M'sia ppl still go shopping every weekend. More mall dispense the crowd. YR house value would jump 100% The good thing is no more jaming and wasting time looking for parking at midvalley. Compare everyweek must reach there before 11am, else hv problem finding parksing space, sometime the driver can be Else worry buy both.... |
|
|
Jul 23 2013, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(gark @ Jul 23 2013, 01:39 PM) Mall REIT traditionally have the least dividend yield, typically <5% and <4.5% net tax. Now 10 year MGS is heading towards 3.5%, from 3% previously. BTWREIT yields are no longer attractive to compensate for the extra risk (~100 bps). So the yield have to rise to match the risk, hence the prices are falling. The more the MGS security yield goes up, the more lower the prices to compensate. Ten-year government bonds pay 3.82 percent, indicating Prasarana’s new securities may yield more than the 3.77 percent it paid for that maturity in August 2012 Edge http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-ne...rates-jump.html This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jul 23 2013, 01:46 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0263sec
0.20
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 03:56 PM |