Aliens yes. ETs no.
I would suggest that in this thread, we stop using the word "aliens" when we mean "ETs".
Ancient Aliens
|
|
 Sep 6 2012, 09:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Elite
11,400 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
|
Quote|
|
Sep 7 2012, 08:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
11,400 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(CityBluePrint @ Sep 7 2012, 12:27 AM) Let's take the case of Stonehenge Stonehenge seems somewhat low-tech to have been constructed by space faring ETs.Radiocarbon dating indicated that the monument was erected or built between (3100-1600) BC. Were the barbarians or natives (not the Celts) then capable of such a monumental task?  Or were they aliens (if not ET what other civilization) footprints left behind?  Added on September 7, 2012, 8:27 am QUOTE(arthurlwf @ Sep 7 2012, 01:09 AM) Stonehenge is one of the weirdest as how it's been constructed. Don't now. But "ETs did it" is an even weirder explanation. Especially considering how the lines are made. By painstakingly removing red pebbles to reveal the white sands underneath. Must have taken a very long time. I just can't see ETs spending all the time doing this. Don't they have anything better to do? When the Americans went to the moon, did they spend years carefully drawing lines on the ground?However, the most puzzling site are: 1) Nasca Lines http://www.world-mysteries.com/mpl_1.htm How on earth the native can draw such a big line and yet it make sense when somebody travel by air that look at the shape?  QUOTE 2) Pumapunku http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumapunku Slowly and carefully. Stone carving have been done for a very long time. If you can carve a statue, you can carve a block with a flat surface.How on earth the native can cut the stone with such precision? that even today technological have difficulty to craft it out  Added on September 7, 2012, 8:29 am QUOTE(nitr0bacter @ Sep 6 2012, 03:05 PM) i have read something like this in New Scientist. Our DNA consists of introns and exons. exons contain all the information needed to code for all our proteins, whereas introns are just jumbled up sequences which code for nothing, in other words they are useless. the question is why are they there. so one theory is aliens inserted these sequences as some sort of secret message or something. Alternatively, they are proof of evolution, as opposed of ID.This post has been edited by dkk: Sep 7 2012, 08:29 AM |
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 10:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
11,400 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(3dassets @ Sep 8 2012, 11:00 PM) The idea of many skilled expert slave carvers has been suggested, that does not explain the identical geometrical structure of the H block as compared to grinding the stone against each other to fit which is irregular. To demand unnecessary or geometrical design is against logic knowing it could take a life time of only expert carvers to complete, more so if the purpose of the blocks is a wall, and wall is for protection, it should be fast and strong and cubical, only after the wall is completed, details are added just like most temple are carved out of the cave or wall instead of build like the Pyramid. And the reason why ETs would want these blocks carved in these identical geometrical shapes is because ... ?I do not think it is a better explanation. How did you jump from "I cannot see how those early pre-industrial peoples did this" to "so ETs must have done it". A better explanation would be if someone had found evidence like those surface had not been shaped with chisels, but somebody used high speed powezr tools or lasers, or something else those ancient peoples couldn't have. Otherwise "I cannot imagine how they did it" is not evidence of "ETs did it", or anything else. |
| Change to: |  0.0456sec
 0.44
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 08:32 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.