Sep 5 2012, 01:38 PM
QUOTE(MR_alien @ Sep 5 2012, 12:17 PM)
theres no replacement for displacement...N/A is still the best
turbo(small) just increase the torque but for horsepower not really
there are big turbo that will increase the HP but thn turbo lag
so...getting the 2.0L is still the best and the fact that its a mitsu engine(more advanced) and using timing chain is enough to convince me to take it if i have the budget
If I have a choice for NA and Turbo, I will definitely go for Turbo without considering too much.turbo(small) just increase the torque but for horsepower not really
there are big turbo that will increase the HP but thn turbo lag
so...getting the 2.0L is still the best and the fact that its a mitsu engine(more advanced) and using timing chain is enough to convince me to take it if i have the budget
Because I appreciate higher torque than higher HP.
Normally higher HP only provides better power during high RPM and better top speed where we are seldom reach or need it in daily usage.
However, significant low end torque provided by Turbo is very useful during overtaking, hill road and city driving. You will addicted with a turbo car with plenty of torque for you to zig zag in the city or highway overtaking without shifting down your gear.
Moreover, turbo car serves you maximum of torque from as low as 1.xxk RPM to 4.xxk RPM, very wide range of torque spreaded compared to NA car
Quote
0.0221sec
0.69
6 queries
GZIP Disabled