QUOTE(kochin @ Dec 8 2012, 09:40 PM)
and btw yes, this prs biggest attraction is for the tax relief. 26% for the highest income bracket. even if the fund does not give positive return, we would have gotten the gain upfront equivalent to our tax relief lor.
I think there’s enough explanations in all the previous postings on the role of tax relief in PRS, so I need not elaborate more on the taxes, coz ultimately everyone has their logical thinking behind.
There’s no right/wrong. But for the high tax bracket person who does not agree with your statement above although he has the additional RM3k to spare, I think there could be 3 scenarios:
1. He is a bloodly good investor, and consistently make >26% returns on their investments every year. So PRS is an added risk for them
2. He is very risk averse.
3. He has enough exposure on equities
For me, even if the year is badly hit and the PRS fund manager loses >20%, I don’t think I am that good to use the RM3k to make any profits for myself in any risk investments for that year (besides FD).
And also RM3k/yr is but another diversification in portfolio to me as it will be the first UT that I am buying.
Added on December 10, 2012, 5:43 pmQUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 10 2012, 12:50 PM)
Dont forget that the main purpose of the PRS scheme is for ppl to pump money into our country's financial system. Thats the only way to stay afloat in times of crisis. So basically, the rakyat is helping with a bailout of our financial system. Although not at critical level yet but if both Europe and US remain in recession for 2013, then the domino effect will hit Malaysia.
Thanks for putting things into another perspective for us. Which makes me recollect what my Public mutual fund salesperson says that they (PRS fund providers) r not very keen and it’s the government that mandate certain bank/company to setup this PRS. I am not sure why but maybe fund too small? And it could be WIN-WIN situation more for both rakyat and government? My biggest worry is that the funds are not putting their top notch fund managers to manage this PRS.
Also the fund size may not be big as I think majority of the contributor will be non-bumi, higher tax bracket earners due to lesser avenue for them for bigger tax deduction. And their small RM3k contributions will be spread out in the 8 PRS providers.
This post has been edited by turbopips: Dec 10 2012, 06:00 PM