Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Private Retirement Scheme Started?

views
     
turbopips
post Dec 7 2012, 02:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
i spoke to a PRS agent and apparently i was encouraged to buy their unit trust instead. In fact i was told that it is the government that put a mandatory for these banks to set up this PRS and they had no choice but to accept the government offer.

Also the fund size according to the agent will be very small, whereby only higher income tax payers will buy and max will only be RM3k.
Imagine in reality who and how many ppl in Malaysia really pay tax? This times RM3k/year and then divided into 8 funds approved by government.
Therefore the PRS fund size is very small for each bank and also no historical proven record.

I really into this PRS as it give 26% returns every year (via income tax). on the other hand, i am worried that with PRS given at lowest priority among the other unit trust by the 8 banks, the capability of fund managers assigned by the bank may not generate any growth of money.

Any thoughts?
turbopips
post Dec 8 2012, 12:51 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
Thanks to all sifus for the advice as this is the first time I will invest in ut as I normally invest in equities.
Actually the prs agent is from public mutual.
I dunno how true but agent told me she makes the same commission but she prefers to invest in normal ut than prs due to what I stated earlier.
But when I explain about close to 26% yoy return (10yrs) then only she realize my intention of buy prs.

I am not sure if rm3k /yr is a lot or not when invest in ut but I am quite sure most ppl will not buy more than 3k per yr for prs. And if yr tax bracket not high, he/she may think twice or wait a few yrs first to see performance before buy. The agent says bigger fund offers more flexibility n liquidity n is better.

I read the brochure n the same fund managers manage the three funds(growth, moderate n conservative). They r liew mun hon and zaharudin ghazali. I have no idea who they r or their track record. In hong kong, there is no epf equivalent,, but employees have to contribute a certain amount thru prs n some of the funds is losing money n my counterparts there are cursing. At least here the gov is giving ard 26% "discount" depend on yr tax bracket.

So far I only consult public mutual so if others have consulted other providers do share yr thoughts of which prs to buy. Thank you.
turbopips
post Dec 8 2012, 01:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 8 2012, 09:38 AM)
Thats wht i thought as well. But he just mentioned 26% which isnt really correct. He's merely saving on the equivalent of a 26% tax on the taxable amount above 100K which equates to RM780 only for the whole year.

But my question is, to get that RM780 tax relief per year, you have to ensure you invest in a PRS fund that gives you back a better return. I mean it would be pointless to invest in something that 'loses' money rite? So although u may be saving RM780 from taxes, you risk losing much more through the investment itself. Is this a risk or am i being too paranoid?
*
Maybe I have confused u. Rm780/3000=26%. if the fund mgr didn't make any money, u get 26%return from the3k u invested. The question is whether the fund mgr is capable to grow or lose yr capital?

U mentioned above "to get that rm780 tax relief per year, u have to ensure you invest in a prs fund that gives you back better return" -- this is not true. Whether or not the fund perform, if u invested rm3k per year n yr tax bracket is 26%, u will get yr rm780 tax relief. Hope this explains.


Added on December 8, 2012, 1:55 pm
QUOTE(creativ @ Dec 8 2012, 11:24 AM)
Hi Turbopips,

doh.gif

I would stopped taking advise from your unit trust agent if I were you.

If you want to buy from her, go ahead, she is a sales person after all. The only benefit I see is that she can help you with the administrative work of buying a fund from her company.

But when it comes to investment and financial advice, stop taking it from her.
*
I call public bank but the salesperson I talked to only sell ut,not prs. And she does not want to recommend me any agent, citing she don't know. Last week I saw a public mutual roadshow, n finally I met someone who can sell prs.

In short, she is the only agent I know who sell prs. Any recommendation of good prs agent contacts for me?

This post has been edited by turbopips: Dec 8 2012, 01:55 PM
turbopips
post Dec 8 2012, 02:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(xuzen @ Dec 8 2012, 01:21 PM)
Funny enough, the people who are very interested in this PRS scheme tend to be people who are at the highest tax bracket.

Those at the say 3% tax bracket tend not to be so interested in this PRS thingy.

I have an epiphany:

Since some PRS provider are giving zero upfront charges and all else being equal, guess my money will go into PRS vis-a-vis traditional cash investment into UT.

Bye bye Pub-Mut; hello HwangDBS.

I am happy this PRS happened, maybe it will kick-start the beginning of zero upfront era for the industry.

Yeah, Pub-Mut the lumbering and slumbering giant will probably awaken by this and start to give better return to its investors. Zero upfront fee would be a good start.

Xuzen
*
Yes u r rite. If my tax bracket is not more than 15%, I will think twice to invest in prs.
Malaysia income tax is too high n u easily hit the high bracket. Nowadays a person cannot say he is rich if he/she earn rm 120k per year. our salary increase , inflation increase even more, but the income tied to tax bracket remains.

Btw, do share with us the hwang dbs contacts if u think it's better. Thanks
turbopips
post Dec 10 2012, 05:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(kochin @ Dec 8 2012, 09:40 PM)
and btw yes, this prs biggest attraction is for the tax relief. 26% for the highest income bracket. even if the fund does not give positive return, we would have gotten the gain upfront equivalent to our tax relief lor.

*
I think there’s enough explanations in all the previous postings on the role of tax relief in PRS, so I need not elaborate more on the taxes, coz ultimately everyone has their logical thinking behind.

There’s no right/wrong. But for the high tax bracket person who does not agree with your statement above although he has the additional RM3k to spare, I think there could be 3 scenarios:
1. He is a bloodly good investor, and consistently make >26% returns on their investments every year. So PRS is an added risk for them
2. He is very risk averse.
3. He has enough exposure on equities

For me, even if the year is badly hit and the PRS fund manager loses >20%, I don’t think I am that good to use the RM3k to make any profits for myself in any risk investments for that year (besides FD).
And also RM3k/yr is but another diversification in portfolio to me as it will be the first UT that I am buying. 


Added on December 10, 2012, 5:43 pm
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 10 2012, 12:50 PM)
Dont forget that the main purpose of the PRS scheme is for ppl to pump money into our country's financial system. Thats the only way to stay afloat in times of crisis. So basically, the rakyat is helping with a bailout of our financial system. Although not at critical level yet but if both Europe and US remain in recession for 2013, then the domino effect will hit Malaysia.
*
Thanks for putting things into another perspective for us. Which makes me recollect what my Public mutual fund salesperson says that they (PRS fund providers) r not very keen and it’s the government that mandate certain bank/company to setup this PRS. I am not sure why but maybe fund too small? And it could be WIN-WIN situation more for both rakyat and government? My biggest worry is that the funds are not putting their top notch fund managers to manage this PRS.

Also the fund size may not be big as I think majority of the contributor will be non-bumi, higher tax bracket earners due to lesser avenue for them for bigger tax deduction. And their small RM3k contributions will be spread out in the 8 PRS providers.

This post has been edited by turbopips: Dec 10 2012, 06:00 PM
turbopips
post Dec 11 2012, 09:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 11 2012, 08:28 AM)
If its worth my while, i might consider investing in it. Not just for the RM780 discount but for future growth and to diversify my investments.
*
If tax relief is not yr main reason of buying PRS. I suggest its better for u to continue invest in your unit trust/gold. Why?
1. U dont want yr investment to be tied down till the age of 55 years in PRS as the capital is not guaranteed. sad.gif
2. Its historical performance is unknown yet unlike the normal unit trust u buy
3. U may want to wait to see the performance of the PRS fund managers against normal UT to see if there's signifcant.

The money is yours... so this is just suggestion.

This post has been edited by turbopips: Dec 11 2012, 09:16 PM
turbopips
post Dec 18 2012, 10:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(simplesmile @ Dec 18 2012, 04:52 PM)
Thanks for reply. I think I'll take the PM PRS scheme. The deciding factor is the length of time I buy into the fund. I'm 34 and it's another 25 years before I reach retirement age of 60. So, having a lower management fee definitely is more advantage.
*
The annual management fee difference is marginal. U should consider which fund u think will bring better returns. Considering all equal n management fee is yr sole concern, then u should buy hwang in the first year, then switch to another fund with lower fees, eg public mutual in year two. With this u only pay rm25 extra transfer fee but u have saved much more in entrance fees. thumbup.gif
turbopips
post Dec 18 2012, 11:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(poolcarpet @ Dec 18 2012, 10:56 PM)
notworthy.gif

this is exactly what i thought as well... if you transfer to PM, you have to pay RM25 to Hwang AND also RM25 to PPA. That makes it RM50. Plus the 3% by PM as new funds to them.

think if getting this just because of the income tax relief, it's not much invested max is RM30k only over 10 years (and take away your tax portion, it's probably effectively lesser than RM30k).

i was thinking of hwang initially but thought a bit more, and thinking in decades time frame, i'll probably go for PM now since they have a good track record with other funds.
*
Thanks for clarifying. I would like to ask if the management fee is charge based on the amount of fresh money invested in that year or based on the total amount? Example, based on 3k for yr 10 or 30k for yr 10? Thanks.
turbopips
post Dec 20 2012, 11:57 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(poolcarpet @ Dec 18 2012, 10:56 PM)
notworthy.gif

this is exactly what i thought as well... if you transfer to PM, you have to pay RM25 to Hwang AND also RM25 to PPA. That makes it RM50. Plus the 3% by PM as new funds to them.

think if getting this just because of the income tax relief, it's not much invested max is RM30k only over 10 years (and take away your tax portion, it's probably effectively lesser than RM30k).

i was thinking of hwang initially but thought a bit more, and thinking in decades time frame, i'll probably go for PM now since they have a good track record with other funds.
*
I just spoke to Hwang salesperson. Althought the annual management fee is 0.3% higher, we saved on the RM90 sales charge every year. So in 10 years, its RM900 savings in sales charge compared to PM. In year 10 assuming yr fund size increase by 10%, hence RM30k*10% = RM33k.
The management fee difference (for yr 10) is only RM33k*0.3 = RM99. But u have saved RM900 over the 10 yrs..

Initially i thought the 3% is only charge 1 time only but apparently its charge every time there is fresh funds invested into the account.

So i guess the most important is still the fund performance.
Feel free to advise if my assumption is wrong.
turbopips
post Dec 20 2012, 01:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(poolcarpet @ Dec 20 2012, 12:12 PM)

RM3000 contributed today, for 15 yrs (assume age 40 now).

PM:
Yr 1 sales charge - RM90
Annual management/trustee/ppa fee (1.60% of RM2910 cause RM90 reduced under sales charge) - RM46.56
Total management/trustee/ppa fee over 15 yrs - RM698.40

Hwang:
Yr 1 sales charge - RM0
Annual management/trustee/ppa fee (1.88%) - RM56.40
Total management/trustee/ppa fee over 15 yrs - RM846

*
PM:
Yr 1 sales charge - RM90
Annual management/trustee/ppa fee (1.60% of RM2910 cause RM90 reduced under sales charge) - RM46.56
Total management/trustee/ppa fee over 15 yrs - RM698.40
Total sales charge over 15 years = RM90 *15 = RM1350
Hwang:
Yr 1 sales charge - RM0
Annual management/trustee/ppa fee (1.88%) - RM56.40
Total management/trustee/ppa fee over 15 yrs - RM846
Total sales charge over 15 years = RM0 *15 = RM0


U for forgot about sales charge RM90 to be paid every year assuming u invest RM3k every yr.


turbopips
post Dec 20 2012, 01:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(kochin @ Dec 20 2012, 01:45 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


turbopips and poolcarpet boss,
assuming all else being equal, please review my spreadsheet as attached.
This is based on the following assumption:
1. Yearly investment of RM3k for 10 years (align with current tax relief break as announced recently).
2. Assume no change in fees imposed by PM and Hwang (Initial cost for PM at 3%, management fees of PM - 1.6% and Hwang - 1.88%)
3. Assume same growth for both funds at 5% yearly

From my spreadsheet you would be able to see the breakeven for all things being equal, Hwang holds the advantage for the first 15 years wherelse PM holds the advantage for longer term.
Please also note that from Year 9 onwards, Hwang's management fees would be higher than PM's initial cost price of RM90 per annum.
Again the differences is quite marginal and all boils back down to performance of the fund ultimately.

Please feel free to correct if there is any flaws in my analysis.

Thank you. notworthy.gif
*
Thanks Ko Chin for the sharing.. Very expert in Excel ah... I agree that it boild down to performance of fund ultimately.
Just curious to know, in the event the government decide to extend the tax relief up to 15 or 20 years (ie the RM3k investment continues) will PM still have a lower cost? Thanks
turbopips
post Dec 20 2012, 02:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(kochin @ Dec 20 2012, 02:06 PM)
i did my spreadsheet immediately after reading your post but i did not saved the file.  doh.gif
can redo quite easily.  cool2.gif

and i did plunked in the figure for extended years beyond the initial 10 years.
PM still come out tops in the long run. but again marginal.

so it still boils down to the fund as even 0.5%-1% of the fund growth differences would ultimately be the game changer here.
*
Yeah.. if investment continues, i think in year 19 PM will overtake Hwang in terms of cost, assuming fund performance is equal.
Probably thats the time to switch fund if one hasn't reach retirement age yet. tongue.gif
turbopips
post Nov 18 2013, 10:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
Hi all,
I know we can use EPF $ to buy UT. But can we use EPF $ to buy PRS too?
Thanks.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0177sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 07:46 PM