pic spam

120826-Spas-001 by Cybreed, on Flickr

hahaha the title is YOU CANT SEE ME

had a great mini shooting last weekend


120825-Mini-002 by Cybreed, on Flickr

---

Added on August 29, 2012, 10:17 amactually its out of camera.. i guess my in camera contrast a bit high

This post has been edited by gerald7: Aug 29 2012, 10:17 AM

hehe Id say go for the 70s cooper... i jst dont like the pedals, a bit too close or my taste. cant really drive with crocs shoes.

, it is what it is man, just a very busy photo

tats called a barter trade

Wwah every one poison 35mm.......... .. . . ..

less than 7k.. RM 6999.99

I have been using the 1755 for 6 years. on my d80 to the d300. Thats my go to lens at all events. for 17-55 range, nothing special really. its like your kit lens, but the color and sharpness is diff, and when the lights are low, this lens really shines. sure there are no creamy bokeh... for me thats fine, as Im jst recording the event which usually means many people and many things happening at once. I dont jst isolate the prettiest gal in the function and stalk her all nite. I probably wont get paid if I tried that. Another thing impressed me about this lens is how reliable it is. Focusing is still highly accurate and fast, zoom still fluid. Only complain i have is the zoom and focus rubber ... change twice already! I think need to go in for third change.

Thats my one and only DX glass. the rest are FX (ready), so if one day I do jump to FX, I think it will not be as bad as changing all the glass.


For me I would not take 2470 on a crop body. Reason? you lose out on the wide end. If you dont see yourself going FX in the next 2-3 years. Grab the 1755. Even next time you want to sell it, its still hold a decent value. At the end of the day, its your money you can buy what ever you want. Dont mind how people think, student with expensive lens. So what?

tats my old man grumpy two cents no offense intended to anyone who feels offended.

---

Added on August 31, 2012, 1:54 am1/4000 ? FX wor... say it aint so !

This post has been edited by gerald7: Aug 31 2012, 01:54 AM

@ifer,
speaking of interior and architecture, is distortion really that bad that must be killed on sight? Im curious, my friend want to go into architecture photography I have not much experience or interest on that. I always assumed its how ' correct ' the clients want the building to be? My friends thinking of getting the tilt shift lens. My thinking is if can get jobs once a month, why not .... but if once ayear....? Whats a relatively decent starting lens for architecture photography ?

@ifer
correcting barrel distortion on buildings in post, how 'accurate' is that? as compared to a lens with minimal barrel distort. haha my friend using canon 1Ds.. im not sure how serious he is, but he has has been talking about it for years.

So if i wanted to do a some architecture photography my 1755 would be sufficient for a start ?




on a side note, today I was given an extra flash from 1988.. lol ... SB-24 amazing, it still works! But no optical trigger, drats!

ah... 17mm TSE huh.. ok ok thanks for the comments, much appreciated!



Pic Spam .. from my fav car park..

120825-Mini-003 by Cybreed, on Flickr

Just in case anyone want to win some monay


....

This post has been edited by gerald7: Sep 3 2012, 10:43 PM

I think landscape will be most submitted ah.. nm la. try la... I think ill submit 1 or 2 landscape too hahaha !

when got cars and girls to shoot...

whats wrong with the color ?

not too many photographer ?

Pic SpAM!

Its a fact that portraiture drives a lot of interest. And probably a lot of sales for camera companies. Last round 2 rounds of nikon club in my area, no amoi shooting, a lot less ppl show up, even those that did, disappear after 10 mins. Well I stayed till very end for both.

tats probably right. too much activities. Everyone so bz. LOL. yum cha also have to booking early early one. here I jst text and its on!