guys, any thoughts on using an AF nikkor 10.5 on a D40?
is not having autofocus a big issue for UWA?
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.17
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.17
|
|
Sep 22 2012, 08:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
guys, any thoughts on using an AF nikkor 10.5 on a D40?
is not having autofocus a big issue for UWA? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2012, 11:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2012, 11:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
hey guys! appreciate some opinion here
i'm thinking of getting a used 18-200 VR1. main reason is i need a wide angle lens (well 18mm kinda counts as wide angle) the thing is, i cant afford one so im probably going to sell off my 85mm 1.8G for it. the reason i bought the 85mm is to get full body portrait shots with nice bokeh (see below). can the 18-200 VR1 produce a similar shot (at longer focal length, smaller aperture)? ![]() if no, then ill probably just get an 18-55. what do you think? QUOTE(gcphoton @ Oct 16 2012, 10:38 PM) i saw one D40 body only selling for RM500 in garage sales This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: Oct 16 2012, 11:27 PM |
|
|
Oct 17 2012, 10:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Sadru @ Oct 17 2012, 12:09 AM) u cannot compare between zoom and prime bokeh. its just not fair unless its 70-200 we talking about ;P i suspect at 200mm, f/5.6 can produce good full body portraits as well. i'm curious how does it compare to a 85mm, f/1.8 shot.bokeh is affected by both the aperture and focal length. i want to see the comparison between the effects of each. i think that's a fair question |
|
|
Oct 17 2012, 02:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(cuteyuzikid @ Oct 17 2012, 01:49 PM) Well I cant get to technical with you on that, after all I'm just starting out, its just the feeling I get from first impression (and maybe different build, i guess?), but thats the initial factors why I'm starting off with Nikon. Anyhow, if I somewhat turn pro and understand more then I'll compare teeth to teeth later both D5100 and D3200 are very good. i'd lean towards the D5100 for the screen though ANYWAY, I'm still not sure if I should go for D5100 or D3200! I love portrait and macro shots, but I guess those I can optimize from the lenses I buy in the future? So what should I look for in the camera body to help make my decision? Hope to hear your wise opinions |
|
|
Oct 17 2012, 09:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
i'm going to shoot my first wedding soon too :S not sure what can i do with just a 35mm and 85mm. i dont even own a flash lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2012, 08:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2012, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2012, 11:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
im using a D40 which doesnt have a commander mode for off-camera flash
yeah i meant optical trigger, sorry. i have a feeling using on-camera flash would be hard (tilt here tilt there haha) |
|
|
Oct 19 2012, 07:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(gerald7 @ Oct 18 2012, 11:42 PM) QUOTE(bad melatonin @ Oct 19 2012, 02:03 AM) if u hv money go wt SB700 or straight SB910. does a remote cord work with the yongnuo? how much would a remote cord cost?if budget constrained, no problem, just go wt 3rd party flash eg. Yongnuo basic ttl speedlite YN-468II. i think price around RM250 ~ 280. it does hv optical slave built in which u can trigger it off camera using ur d40 onboard flash. |
|
|
Oct 19 2012, 04:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(gerald7 @ Oct 19 2012, 09:51 AM) http://www.phottix.com/en/flash-accessorie...emote-cord.html holy crap! remote flash cord would work with any flash unit. not sure wats the price now but I got mine I think under 50RM. One of my fav tools. For me its enough of a distance to make a difference. you got to experiment if you like it or not. I use it in product photography as well. CLS is good but I dont like killing the lifespan of the built in flash on my d80 n d300. Problem with optical trigger is, if your in lets say a actual wedding scenario, you will also have a lot of other ppl w/ camera. and your optical trigger would be triggered by flash, ANY flash from compact to even handphones w/ xenon flash bulbs. So your most likely to deplete your batt juice before u get to use it yourself hahaha. Unless you tell everyone to not take photo it kinda might work. And another nice modifier is the Demb diffuser pro. Gives off pretty sweet light. Even with flash mounted on hot shoe. U might want to look into that as well. If you want to pop your flash far far away then maybe can investigate in remote triggers. xD remote triggers errrrrr if i can afford that, i wouldn't have to ask here LOL. thanks for the remote cord recommendation. i'll consider it. i've been reading Tangent's blog on on-camera flash, he's getting really good results. i'll get an SB700 first and practice2. if no need off-camera flash then good la, one free hand |
|
|
Oct 19 2012, 08:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Pro3363 @ Oct 19 2012, 04:42 PM) see how the center flower stems are sharper compared to the flower itself. that's not very good.DOF (depth of field) refers to a range of distance in front of the camera that will be in focus (sharp). in this case, only the stem is in your focus range, but the flower and the background is not (that's why they're blurry). so DOF can both be a good thing and a bad thing. the good thing about your photo is the background is blur. this is good so the background wont be distracting. but the bad thing about your photo is your subject (the flower) is blurred as well. the two main things that control DOF is Aperture (your lens can open wide and small just like your eyes...aperture is how big the opening is) and focal length (distance between you and your subject). this means there are two things you can try to improve: 1) easiest is just take the photo from a further distance. you can later crop (cut off the sides) the photo on your PC. unfortunately this also makes the background less blur (or less "bokeh"). just try to find a good balance 2) if you have a camera with manual controls (or any DSLR and interchangeables), set to Aperture Priority mode. normally there's a dial on top of ur camera and you switch it to 'A' or 'Av' (canon). take multiple exact shots while you increase and increase the aperture 'F' number. you'll see the higher number makes a larger 'range' of things in focus (a deeper DOF) so you can have more of the flower in focus. |
|
|
Oct 19 2012, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(amduser @ Oct 19 2012, 09:07 PM) BUT....shooting at this range (near closest focus distance) with small aperture is also hard to get the flower petal and the middle part in focus, dept of field goes even smaller when the focal length increase i find it the opposite. it's easier for me to get more things in focus if i shoot from afar. seems that you're also (adversely) implying that decreasing focal length would increase depth of field. this means if Pro3363 shoots closer to the flower, he would get more in focus. this is of course not true.QUOTE(gerald7 @ Oct 19 2012, 09:08 PM) nothing wrong with on shoe flash, jst try to bounce to larger white source (such as walls) to 'amplify' the light. But bear in mind if its a chinese wedding u will be bouncing into a lot of red! LOL i haven't got the chance to survey the location yet. i've looked at a lot of great photos made simply by using one on shoe flash; i'm convinced!! praying for company bonus |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2012, 09:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2012, 07:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(rickyro @ Oct 20 2012, 06:55 PM) i see. i always see people buying either one of those. u have both i wont call the focus ring of my 35mm "able to feel every single cog" though. i can feel like there's a gear somewhere but not that pronounced |
|
|
Oct 21 2012, 11:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Nicholasontheway @ Oct 21 2012, 10:43 AM) Hey guys, can give some idea on a new lens? I'm using nikon D90 for 3 to 4 years already and the lens don't know why everything auto focus vibrate like hell =.= depends on what you like to shoot Any Less than 1.5k lens? cannot send ur lens for repair? |
|
|
Oct 21 2012, 05:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Oct 21 2012, 03:03 PM) got ad in today's the star paper somewhere at the back part. wow. must bring the ad in the newspaper and bring to the shop. prepare for argument i think for now probably nikon shop in putrajaya or klcc since most dealers probably wont know, or pretend not to know so can get more money. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0596sec
0.51
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 02:40 AM |