QUOTE(davidke20 @ Sep 3 2012, 08:09 AM)
After long testing with BHP, finally I managed to finish that tank of petrol.Clocked 452.3km(usually 500+ with ESSO). After input data to fuelly, below are some shocking findings

11.26km/litre
8.879litre/100km
16.9cents/km
I loss about 20% of mileage on BHP compare to ESSO. While using BHP, I can hear my engine pinging most of the time, I had to gradually decrease speed to reduce ping. Worse is, any hill climb will result in more ping! If you heard of Iswaga taxi turning into corner whilst lazy to change gear, maintain at 4th gear pickup then you hear engine crying out loud something like "click, click, click" kinda annoying noise. However, on long straight road, I think its doing very well. I will just have to maintain light foot on the gas pedal, the car will cruise into its phase. Vacuum able to maintain 15in/hg and above on 5th gear running at 90kmh. I guess with a tank of BHP running pure highway will be a better choice. The rest of the territory suck. Sprint is lousy, uphill climb is lacking, over taking is horrible, for me its not quite suitable as I'm a town driver.
The next tank is Petronas Primax 95 Extra. Its been years I haven't use petronas, the vapor smell is very strong! The same route I'm going through every week is going to help me decide which is the better petrol for me and my family. If anything can beat ESSO/Mobil/Petron, I will gladly redeem all my smile points then switch over to the best available petrol

QUOTE(davidke20 @ Sep 3 2012, 09:08 AM)
Well, that's why I'm testing all different kind petrol now. Carburetor don't lie

if low octane, then it ping

octane too hai, hill climb crippled

Let me finish this tank of petronas 1st, later after update fuelly I will update here again. Let the result speaks by figure

Nice report~! but why sum ppl use BHP can get good mileage??
btw waiting ur petronas report..
p/s : my this tank mileage will be very low lar... kaki gatal for a while go cucuk ppl...haha