QUOTE(super_evil_alien @ Nov 27 2012, 12:17 PM)
Better camera & screen for sure but these won't cost way too much to produce.These aren't AMOLED screen which is well known as expensive screen.Lumia 900 only have the wireless inductive.Again,the hardware won't be that expensive.The heavy lift for the wireless charging is done by the wireless charging station which is not included in retail package.Certainly Lumia is a premium product but I believe that the price should be fixed for RM2K.Nokia won't be selling this phone for a cheap price because they are trying to change US & number of european customers perception that Nokia only sell cheap stuff.
About the aspire's situation,let's be civil here shall we? Comparing multiple devices is fine but don't go overboard.Always remember this is a Windows Phone thread where WP users want reviews & solution for their device related problem.Different hardware & OS have their own advantage & disadvantage.If we really want to go for it it'll be an endless war.
I always loved the N900 & N9's threads.We kept the thread very technical & pleasant.New owners can just come in & search for the info they need without getting lost in rubbish post.Remember that this kind of flame war attitude that caused admin to suspend the post count & ban users last time.
I hope this will be the end of the whatever product is the best.If you have the absolute best phone in the world pm me instead.I'm looking for 1.
Damn...I posted like a saint

I guess I am just comparing it with the iPhone 4s that I have which cost me close to RM3K when I bought it in January. Nokia has a lot of balancing act it has to do. I do believe that if Nokia were to price it too low, then there is the perception that it is a non-quality product. It also has to satisfy its shareholders and with the current cash reserve that is probably less then when they started on the Windows Phoen bandwagon, they really can't be taking a loss (or too much loss). For a guy like me who can afford it and someone who really loves buying these gadgets, I personnaly feel that RM2050 (I am paying that amount from Nokia Saudi) is cheap as hell. The only phone that I ever bought that was cheaper than 2K is the N8 which I promptly sold after 7 months. Then again, that's me personally.
There will always be people who complains etc. If Nokia were to price it at 1500, there will be people who complains that it's too expensive and it should be priced at 1K etc, so where do you draw the line? It is selling for 700 AUD in Australia, close to 520 pounds in UK and above 700 Euros in EU countries. The cheapest price I've seen is the off contract prices from AT&T at USD450 and that is off contract and not factory unlocked. Is the Malaysian market that big that Nokia should give us an exception to price their product below what everyone else in the world is paying? I can see them doing it in China and the US but I doubt Malaysia has the same clout.