http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2469121/+80

---

Added on August 14, 2012, 1:26 pmEven the Vios dugong version had alot of problems with the dashboard. I think many Jap car users now are going for cheaper dashboards. Harder and more plasticky which in time will start to creek. The Forte dash is different from the Optima rite?

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 14 2012, 01:26 PM

The 52L is only a reference. The actual capacity is always more than that. Same like Optima K5. Specs mention 70L tank but can tekan until 82L.

Optima fuel tank is slightly different to Forte i think. Its got a long nozzle or neck while the fuel sensor is located in the tank itself. But generally in most tanks, you can fill about 2-3L more than your specified capacity. The Vios for instance has only a 42L tank but you can fill up to 45L sometimes on really 'dry' days.

Well im a new Optima K5 owner and for those of you who know me, ull know that i used to bash Korean cars alot since i was a Jap owner before this. But after test driving the Forte and Optima and then doing alot of research online, i realised that the Korean makes now are far superior compared to their earlier counterparts. Optima and Forte are far from perfect for sure but at least they are much improved. And after almost 4 months of owning the K5, i must say im impressed with the level of service so far. Based on my experience with 2 service centres, i can say that Naza is serious about their brand image and are taking steps to overcome the negative perception.

I complained about a squeeky rear suspension. Very minor and could have been resolved by some lubrication to the bushings i think. But Naza Kia HQ, instructed the SC to replace both rear shock absorbers and bushings FOC under warranty. I also commented that the front power window was a bit 'rough' going up. And behold, they changed the entire motor assembly. Again FOC. One of my front fog lamp covers melted a bit and they replaced it with 2 new set of fog lamps again FOC although this isnt covered by warranty.

This would never have happened with Toyota. I would have had to send my car in a few times and complain like crazy before they replaced anything under warranty. I believe what Naza Kia is trying to do is to eradicate the negative perception about Korean quality. They dont wanna waste time 'repairing or checking. Instead they just replace and this gives the customer alot of confidence.

We have a 5 year unlimited mileage manufacturer warranty and if this level of service can continue, then i have no fears. But Naza Kia HQ needs to know about your problems and issues. Raising it only with the respective SC's may not get you a good response. Send emails to them but i found that posting your problem on the Kia Malaysia Facebook page is quite effective. Ive had a few issues resolved very fast after being posted on FB. Naza has a dedicated staff constantly monitoring the FB page so trust me when i say they will take action sooner or later.

Kia in Malaysia is still facing a problem as many of the front liners (salesmen) are not very competent. Many of their mechanics are also not very experienced. But i think they are slowly being weeded out. I know of 2 salesmen from 2 different branches who were asked to leave after complaints on Facebook.

So keep making constructive critisms but dont just post negatives. Also post positive experiences to be fair to Naza Kia as that will give them more motivation to improve.

Cheers!

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 15 2012, 09:53 AM

Rotation and allignment are NOT under warranty but they can still do it for you depending on a case by case basis. But what im refering to are not mood based. Its technical and whether its covered under warranty or not or if Kia will still support otherwise. So far ive had no issues. Not sure how the future will be.

---

Added on August 15, 2012, 12:05 pmSo far i did mine outstation. But there's a good Kia SC at Taman Megah which my family members have gone to in the past. Run by a Chinese guy and his mother. Quite efficient and reliable.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 15 2012, 12:05 PM

For my K5 during highway driving its quite economical. I get instant FC readings of 9.1L/100km at 110kmph and 10.20L/100km at 160kmph. City driving not so economical for sure since the K5 is quite heavy and the torque not sufficient.

Whats your instant FC readings during highway cruising?

Whats the difference between the various packages?

Actually im mistaken with the figures. This time i tested using the autocruise on level road and i got readings of around 5.5L/100km for 110kmph. My K5 is 3 months old.

I was told that the fuel consumption of the Forte 2.0L is quite bad. Not sure if this is true or not. But can someone provide me actual FC figures of 100% highway and 100% city driving?

And please dont use currency or money to state fuel consumption. L/100Km or actual mileage per full tank of X litres would be acceptable.

Forte fuel tank size is 52L right?

White is most difficult to maintain. Requires daily washing and since u wash too often the paint wont last and it will still turn yellowish over the years. You have to do a coating e.g Sierra Glow.

In about 4-5 years time, ull know the answer.

Any good promo for Kia Forte 1.6SX or 2.0 in Klang Valley?