hi guys, during leisure time, had opportunity reading many things on the net. Im not trolling nor try to do direct comparison. Just throwing some opinions.
Never been a doubt, myvi is one of the economical cars to run interm of fc, coz the car is designed to be a city car, not cruiser or tourer. But recent reading on otoreview did mentioned, myvi 1.5 auto, during town driving, approximately 80 city 20 hway, consume below 10km perlitre, n the worst is 8.8km perlitre. But on 70%hway n 30% city, it consume around 14km perlitre to 12 n even 11km perlitre,depend on speed n etc.
What has been in my mind is that never heard any complaining regarding the fc on the net. Is it because an isolated case or is it because highly acclaimed toyota@daihatsu sourced engine really gives impact on consumers?
Same when reading on forte@elantra@others, they accept it with with reason that diff segment, diff displacement n diff weight especially when somebody point out comparo it with vios or even city.
Im not saying forumers in here coz in this forum, everybody is matured enough on that matters, just previous survey on general public, they did do direct comparison on fc like saga vs myvi, persona vs vios, preve vs vios n etc without taking into account maybe due to weight differences, diff displacement, diff segment, diff type (salon@family sedan versus compact), na versus turbo charge n etc.
What urs opinion on that? Is it prtn cars really really teribble in fc meaning really big diff in margin?
Added on August 10, 2012, 10:11 pmfor front n rear windshield, i dont think security tint is needed coz its already used laminated glass. By adding security tint, make it really hard for rescue operations during accident. But the opt is yours by the way.
Added on August 10, 2012, 10:11 pmfor front n rear windshield, i dont think security tint is needed coz its already used laminated glass. By adding security tint, make it really hard for rescue operations during accident. But the opt is yours by the way.
Added on August 10, 2012, 10:12 pmfor front n rear windshield, i dont think security tint is needed coz its already used laminated glass. By adding security tint, make it really hard for rescue operations during accident. But the opt is yours by the way.
I think most people think of fuel saving when they pump petrol. They just look at the total RM. Less RM, ohh this car so good FC. Big RM, my god so much I have to pump?
That's the reaction of my friend whom I sold my Accord to. I had to explain to him the reason he has to fuel up RM90+ is because the Accord has a 65L tank. And that RM90+ can last him 2 weeks+. When you do objective calculation of km/L it is not that bad. But he was a bit taken aback by the cost of fuel-up.