QUOTE(puchongite @ Nov 28 2012, 11:32 AM)
Don't think you can compare this developer with Trinity Group. The developer has no plan to bring "feel good" factors to the buyers. They only stick to their plan - a modest plan.
You guys will discover more when VP.
Compare to Trinity Group in terms of?
Yes. I agree tat Trinity has bringing in feel good factor like offering double glaze glass for ZR during sales. While KR1/2 is not and they seems very bullish enough with their marketing. Both of Knox and Trinity are new boutique developers and will compete with each other.
Trinity Group had all the credits for TZ, which was looked quite successful but they had torrid time for Heron.
While, KR S/B and Knox Group only have record of completed projects as main contractor but not as developer yet. Its hard to compare in tis factor.
KR1/2 might asking dev factor in the double glaze glass like ZR provided. In return, ZR buyers might asking Trinity to provide own level access / quadrant zone lobby / DIBS which KR1/2 provided.
I rather it feel ok now and feel good or fair later upon VP or staying. No point feel good now / upon buying and feel angry few months upon VPed.
At least, in terms of financial background, honesty and arrangement back end, I still comfortable with Knox more than Trinity Group.
It was due to I am a buyer of both developers.