Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Kiara Residence 2, Bukit Jalil / Bukit OUG v2, A concept quadrant zone living in BJ
|
cybermaster98
|
Apr 20 2015, 01:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Apr 20 2015, 11:53 AM) Not sure on Type A's RM 606 psf but with KR1 can hit up to RM 600 psf, guess no issue.
Type C is lower due to subsale prices of KR1 and ZR same sizes was too fluctuate and pulling it down. But verbally, RM 535 psf now ( RM 780k ) is no issue and I think can reach min RM 800k upon VP end of the year, unless some owners sold RM 750k to get quicker deal like what some few ZR big sizes owner doing now. What the most recent transacted prices for KR1 (small & big units) and at what floor pls?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Apr 20 2015, 10:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Apr 20 2015, 06:22 PM) KR1 small unit, Type A 1050 sq ft transacted at RM 620k, quite a number of units from RM 600-620k.
Type C 1454 sq ft transacted btw RM 700-730k and quite fluctuate bcz RM 730k onwards does not move well. So basically, KR now subsale transacted at around RM600psf for Type A while Type C transacted at around RM500psf. How many of the KR1 units have been sold subsale since VP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 19 2015, 11:17 PM
|
|
RM700 psf for what size unit? Surely cant be for the bigger Type C units right?
And what does she mean by 'received a letter of quotation'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 21 2015, 02:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(uncle T @ May 20 2015, 11:37 PM) [attachmentid=4455548][attachmentid=4455549] Saw this just now  Is this for an actual subsale or sale of developer units? Which units were sold?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 21 2015, 08:40 AM
|
|
QUOTE(puchongite @ May 21 2015, 07:08 AM) Looks like a quotation to me. Is not the valuation report itself. Is the psf figure in quatation usable as the value of the property ?  Yes looks like a quote for valuation fees for a certain price benchmark. No indication that its the actual valuation for the unit plus no indication if this is for the smaller or bigger units. This post has been edited by cybermaster98: May 21 2015, 08:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 24 2015, 09:03 PM
|
|
On track for VP as planned?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 25 2015, 08:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(twincharger07 @ May 25 2015, 08:01 AM) Realistically 600psft shouldn't be a problem These are actually transactions taking KR1 as reference http://www.brickz.my/transactions/resident...lil/non-landed/Big or small units?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 25 2015, 09:16 AM
|
|
QUOTE(puchongite @ May 25 2015, 08:47 AM) The size and the psf are also listed on the page. To answer the question, 600 psf is for smallish. Seems that between Nov to Jan this year, the highest recorded price for KR1 was RM625K for a 1,021sf unit on the 8th floor. Or 612psf. But generally, similar sized units were traded between 578-597 psf for the same period. Not sure about recent transactions though. But if this trend continues or increases, KR2 should see prices >600psf. This post has been edited by cybermaster98: May 25 2015, 10:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 29 2015, 08:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KELLY TEE @ May 29 2015, 07:53 PM) Unfortunately the refinancing fund only can be release once CF is issue. Valuer such as Rahim & Co and MacReal International really can support up to RM680 to RM700 per s. feet for refinancing. Is unrealistic for transaction on Subsale, but is confirm realistic for owner to refinancing to cashout the fund and avoid RBGT  Why is it still 'estimated indicative value'? The documents can be signed in advance but funds released after CF right? So why is it still 'indicative'? Also, where is the actual valuation reports if its indeed so? All the documents provided by your so far are quotations. So far we haven't seen any confirmed docs. Anybody can quote but whether it becomes final is what matters. Could you provide some clarity? This post has been edited by cybermaster98: May 29 2015, 08:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
May 29 2015, 11:53 PM
|
|
QUOTE(twincharger07 @ May 29 2015, 09:13 PM) at the end of the day, still very much depending on the actual transacted price after VP.. letter above are estimated for her refinancing purpose.. there could be owners asking rm900k but no taker..
well let's see.. i do hope the valuation is true tough.. lol.. If there are actual loan offer letters from the banks based on this valuation report, then I guess it would be true. But refinancing is basically getting a bigger loan. Its the actual subsale prices which matter at the end of the day. Its not gonna be easy for buyers to undertake a 800K loan amount in Bukit Jalil. That's a monthly repayment of RM4K a month for 30 years. And with the new refinancing curbs by Bank Negara, its pointless even refinancing to take out money. This post has been edited by cybermaster98: May 30 2015, 12:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 1 2015, 12:08 AM
|
|
But what im curious about is what would anybody wanna refinance with the present rules against refinancing introduced by BNM last year? The legal costs for refinancing isn't worth the small savings from a better interest rate especially for those intending to hold on to their units for <10 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 12 2015, 09:26 AM
|
|
I got the request for payment RM820 for each of my units for TNB I think. But my question is:
1) Why is it so expensive for this installation? 2) Why is the unit number stated in the address different from my booking unit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 12 2015, 01:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Jun 12 2015, 11:23 AM) 1) no idea but that it is 2) Definitely high possibilty will difference, esp in KL in so called Bomba authority and etc for their convenience in security drill. As we bought it with master title, any lot we selected is presented as Lot. No as reference only but not the actual postal address, which only applied before VP. So the new unit numbers will take precedence?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 15 2015, 02:37 PM
|
|
Good that Bukit Jalil City / Pavilion Bukit Jalil launched last week. This should add more value to KR2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 15 2015, 04:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Jun 15 2015, 03:48 PM) Hmm, I rather see the mall is crucial and more added value compare to the service apartments, as it was RM 800+ psf and I will deem it is good if manage to sell 70-80% since it is going to be record pricing in Bkt Jalil.
However, whether the pricing will boost up KR2 or other related condo, it remains a different aspect as the mall expected to complete in 2018 and their service apartments only done by 2019. Yes but as long as both Pavilion 2 and Paradigm 2 are being constructed, it will automatically add value. Plus we will have our Awan Besar operational by then. Hows subsales for KR1 so far? Any latest transactions for big units?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 15 2015, 04:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Jun 15 2015, 04:01 PM) Eh, notice the some new paints apply on it, as it becomes more clearer and whitish ...
Looks nicer than previous 3 months and a lot better than KR1. Probably taller and glass effect. Yes I passed by last Sat and the paintwork looks better than previously. But need to get a up close view to know whether any dilution of paint has happened. If so, then this good effect wont last for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 17 2015, 05:19 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ronn77 @ Jun 16 2015, 11:12 PM) So our units number has changed in accordance with the bomba or whatever sequence it is..a bit disappointed since fot a nice number and now it goes a level down. Same problem here. I had a 8 before this. Now became 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 18 2015, 03:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Jun 18 2015, 03:32 PM) Haha, under DBKL, I get used to it and expected. This thing seldom happened for projects under Selangor.
So, plan to rent out your KR2 or own stay? What kind of rentals can I expect for a 1457sf unit mid floor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 18 2015, 04:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Jun 18 2015, 04:52 PM) I thought by batch and Tower 1 and 2 should be earlier due to they signed S&P earlier than Tower 3.
Nevertheless, all the internal units had been fully done, pending some rectification and the facilities floor. BUt, it looks a bit rushing if by Aug 2015, just 2 months away to finish up the pool and so ... I long time nvr passby so I am not sure. Hows the internal quality? Fittings? Workmanship?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybermaster98
|
Jun 18 2015, 04:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(elmond @ Jun 18 2015, 04:53 PM) fast not good meh? developer save a lot from DIBS wo. Good for developer but not good for us. If they rush, finishing quality will be affected. Plus, we want the LRT to be operational before we get VP. That would ensure slightly better chances of getting decent rental and capital appreciation. It will also ensure the construction debris in front of the condo is cleared.
|
|
|
|
|