VIOS coz:
1. Vios is cheaper
2. All Toyota has better resale value
3. Toyota spare-parts cheaper whereas for Honda, even if one part rosak, you'd need to change the whole thing so it will costs more (from what I heard la)

BUT of coz the City looks much nicer la, and heard that City's engine not as noisy as the Vios's

SO it really depends on the buyer's preference! 

If you buy the vios, you are a f***in idiot.

That car has been face lifted umpteen times.

Toyota is just milking the car for all it is worth.

The technology is borderline ancient.

The design is dated.

The suspension is shit.

The engine is even more shit.

GO ahead, buy the vios =.=

---

Added on August 2, 2012, 9:58 am

where on god's green earth do you get your bloody facts from.

You just comment for the sake of commenting ?

You are comparing a dated Toyota 10 yr old engine versus a relatively new 3 to 4 yr old engine from Honda.

And the best you can do is engine noise ?

Vios FC GOOD ? really ? City SUPER DUPER HIGH ? Really ?

I am lazy to even bother googling for the spec sheet. Go do it yourself.

Argh. Retard.

Facts are facts, which you obviously know nothing.

The current generation vios was introduced in Malaysia October 5, 2007

Using the same engine as the previous generation which was introduced in 2003.

Basically, that piece of shit car is using the same engine for 10 years, and they justify price increase with the smallest of exterior upgrades.

Furthermore, its is obvious from your previous postings that all your facts on cars are pulled out from your ass.

My dear sir.

Maybe your lack of education causes you to be easily "trolled" by people and media.

But facts are facts.

Why do you pay so much for dated technology ? And I mean extremely dated technology.

Your argument "Proven reliable yet practical" is something out from the government books. If it aint broke, dont fix it.

Toyota is abusing ways to get more profit, not because the engine is reliable. Its because fools still want to buy the car eventhough the technology is so ancient, it should be lumped together with a nissan sunny and thrown away.

Admittedly the vios has a range of perhaps 500 km on a full tank while the Honda City about 450 km.

Which I feel is negligible because of the City having a more powerful engine (in terms of output).

----------

Bottom line, if you want to be a fool of a consumer, then please go ahead. Im am happy your parents actually had the brains to buy a honda city and not listen to their son sprout nonsense.

Conclusion, Toyota is abusing the fact that Malaysians have the idiotic mindset of Toyota & Honda is good.

For the amount of money, there are many other car models to consider. But since the TS mention T v H, ill keep to that topic.

I still can't get over the fact that the govt manipulated the media and made us buy Honda City !!!

Dont bother la.

Previous discussion about Audi TT versus Golf GTI also this fella pull out bullshit from the air.

He knows nothing yet talks as if he owns every car in the world in his garage.

He drove this and he drove that.

When corrected, he can come out with arguement like, he only drove a golf gti before and he smoked an audi tt. hence his conclusion is audi tt is shit and golf gti is da bomb.

* Regardless of whether the Audi TT was even trying to race. LOl