no GDI and cost 120K? KIA suppose to be a cheap brand
Kia K3 aka Kia Forte 2013 !, look naise
Kia K3 aka Kia Forte 2013 !, look naise
|
|
May 27 2013, 05:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
891 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
no GDI and cost 120K? KIA suppose to be a cheap brand
|
|
|
May 29 2013, 06:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
891 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(Buydirect @ May 28 2013, 05:52 PM) I do not know and can't verify the prices in US for outgoing Forte and new K3 model. Come on SA, those are the improvement that need to be done by KIA when every 5 years refresh. If no improvement done on new model, how KIA going to sell their new model car? It cannot be use as a sole reason to jack up the price so muchHowever, I disagree on your notion that Naza is pricing the car higher simply because of greed. The price increase in the new Cerato (K3) is justified as Naza has incorporated the following new specs, which are not found in the current Forte. Let's look at the 1.6L model for this study 1) New Dual CVVT Engine 2) Flex steer with 3 driving modes 3) Puddle lamp, pocket lighting 4) 6 airbags 5) Auto Cruise 6) Rear seat aircon vent 7) Motor Driven Power steering 8) Chrome belt line molding 9) Sliding center armrest 10) 4.2 inch dot matrix instrument cluster 11) 10 way power driving seat 12) Memory seat 13) Dual mode aircon 14) improved aerodynamics with rear under cover and air deflectors 15) Improvement in NVH, high noise absorption padding 16) Vehicle Stability Management All these and numerous other improvement/enhancement to the body and class leading technologies which are even too technical to explain. Can we seriously ask for all these features and yet expect Naza to sell at the same price as Forte? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0262sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 09:16 AM |