Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Collectibles DeAgostini The Combat Tanks Collection V2, list & details on pg 1
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:39 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:38 PM) Bro, this was mentioned about few months back if you followed this thread. It is even mentioned in the first post by Tiger I. these two special tanks right, do we still get them as normal issues ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:36 PM) U don't say. At least he is getting something rather than you which will get nothing due to not subscribing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
saukoon
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:38 PM) Bro, this was mentioned about few months back if you followed this thread. It is even mentioned in the first post by Tiger I. sure. I just learned about this thread when searching to confirm whether the 2 replacements are indeed future issue So what can we do? Added on August 1, 2012, 2:41 pmQUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:39 PM) these two special tanks right, do we still get them as normal issues ? check issue 43 and 50 http://www.micksmodelworld.com/DeAgostini/...scollection.htmIMO they will be the same since the magazines are all already printed (and has information on each tanks that attached) This post has been edited by saukoon: Aug 1 2012, 02:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:39 PM) these two special tanks right, do we still get them as normal issues ? Probably no. QUOTE(saukoon @ Aug 1 2012, 02:40 PM) sure. I just learned about this thread when searching to confirm whether the 2 replacements are indeed future issue So what can we do? Dun think they will put in future issue. If they do, please invite me so that we can go whack them and demand the FAMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:43 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:40 PM) U don't say. At least he is getting something rather than you which will get nothing due to not subscribing. you got subscribe meh ?  Added on August 1, 2012, 2:44 pmQUOTE(saukoon @ Aug 1 2012, 02:40 PM) sure. I just learned about this thread when searching to confirm whether the 2 replacements are indeed future issue So what can we do? Added on August 1, 2012, 2:41 pmcheck issue 43 and 50 http://www.micksmodelworld.com/DeAgostini/...scollection.htmIMO they will be the same since the magazines are all already printed (and has information on each tanks that attached) cant be too sure about that, our local issues differ totally from the UK issues. This post has been edited by MikeSAS1992: Aug 1 2012, 02:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(saukoon @ Aug 1 2012, 02:40 PM) Added on August 1, 2012, 2:41 pmcheck issue 43 and 50 http://www.micksmodelworld.com/DeAgostini/...scollection.htmIMO they will be the same since the magazines are all already printed (and has information on each tanks that attached) They are not following the UK list. Just a simple comparison with the Malaysia / Singapore list and you will know. Even last minute change from Type 61 to T-54 in the issue #9. QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:43 PM) you got subscribe meh ?   Yes. Problem? Got my 2 special tanks already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
saukoon
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:46 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:42 PM) Probably no. Dun think they will put in future issue. If they do, please invite me so that we can go whack them and demand the FAMO. but the issue is, the magazines are printed already and each issue tells us what we get next So unless Allscript wants to be mafan to print those "correction page" and have 2 more new units to replace #43 and #50.. but in fact the biggest issue is that #43 and #50 will be around 2+ years from now, so they can just tell/promise us anything
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:46 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:45 PM) They are not following the UK list. Just a simple comparison with the Malaysia / Singapore list and you will know. Even last minute change from Type 61 to T-54 in the issue #9.  Yes. Problem? Got my 2 special tanks already.  Correction: Special Trucks
|
|
|
|
|
|
saukoon
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:46 PM) Correction: Special Trucks great everyone replies fast. Just saw ur comments about MY and SG lists.. so lets see what Allscript will say when they call me later. Will keep everyone posted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(saukoon @ Aug 1 2012, 02:46 PM) but the issue is, the magazines are printed already and each issue tells us what we get next So unless Allscript wants to be mafan to print those "correction page" and have 2 more new units to replace #43 and #50.. but in fact the biggest issue is that #43 and #50 will be around 2+ years from now, so they can just tell/promise us anything Check my post above. Anything can happen but if they put those 2 in normal issue, be sure that a lot of people will be angry bird.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:49 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(saukoon @ Aug 1 2012, 02:47 PM) great everyone replies fast. Just saw ur comments about MY and SG lists.. so lets see what Allscript will say when they call me later. Will keep everyone posted heard of the T-72 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:51 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:46 PM) Correction: Special Trucks Correction: Halftracks. Which you won't be getting any. QUOTE(saukoon @ Aug 1 2012, 02:47 PM) great everyone replies fast. Just saw ur comments about MY and SG lists.. so lets see what Allscript will say when they call me later. Will keep everyone posted Dun worry too much that the 2 will appear in normal issues. They think customers are stupid meh. Sure a lot of people who subscribe will make noises one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:52 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:51 PM) Correction: Halftracks. Which you won't be getting any. Dun worry too much that the 2 will appear in normal issues. They think customers are stupid meh. Sure a lot of people who subscribe will make noises one. so what? i'm okay with it ~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:52 PM) so what? i'm okay with it ~~  Just joking with you only. I know you only care for Red Army tanks, right? If they offered those as free gifts, your tone and reponse will be different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
saukoon
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:49 PM) i'm novice in tank collection.. will get google most of the time why you mentioned T-72?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 02:56 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(saukoon @ Aug 1 2012, 02:55 PM) i'm novice in tank collection.. will get google most of the time why you mentioned T-72? a little while ago, someone suggested that the T-72(a russian tank ) would be replaced by the pendekar PT91-M, a polish tank which malaysian camouflage. i will become angry bird if like that.  Added on August 1, 2012, 2:57 pmQUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:55 PM)  Just joking with you only. I know you only care for Red Army tanks, right? If they offered those as free gifts, your tone and reponse will be different. i will immediately subscribe This post has been edited by MikeSAS1992: Aug 1 2012, 02:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 03:03 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 02:56 PM) a little while ago, someone suggested that the T-72(a russian tank ) would be replaced by the pendekar PT91-M, a polish tank which malaysian camouflage. i will become angry bird if like that.  Added on August 1, 2012, 2:57 pmi will immediately subscribe   Shahren81 who heard it as a rumour from his friend. But not proven and without facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 03:05 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 03:03 PM)  Shahren81 who heard it as a rumour from his friend. But not proven and without facts. i believe T-72 cannot be replaced, because they are not actually the same, the PT91 is just a variant. not the T-72 itself This post has been edited by MikeSAS1992: Aug 1 2012, 03:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fubar20
|
Aug 1 2012, 03:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MikeSAS1992 @ Aug 1 2012, 03:05 PM) i believe T-72 cannot be replaced, because they are not actually the same, the PT91 is just a variant. no the T-72 itself  Just now said want it to be replaced. So fast change already?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeSAS1992
|
Aug 1 2012, 03:09 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Fubar20 @ Aug 1 2012, 03:08 PM)  Just now said want it to be replaced. So fast change already? oops ! accidently deleted the previous statement. sorry ah
|
|
|
|
|