w00t w00t v6

actually polo tsi, u can enable cluster to show how much estimated mileage u can go, VCDS needed ~~~

if you're going for remap or piggyback, the more important figure will be torque
do be reminded, 7 speed DSG is rated to run below 250nm & 6 speed DSG is 350nm
http://www.volkswagenag.com/content/vwcorp...7speed_dsg.html

if u look at neighboring countries, in singapore & aussie roccos are always cheaper than golfs of the same spec
heck even golf 2 door is cheaper than golf 4 door

if beetle 1.2 tsi 138,888 that's like polo 1.2 tsi 108,888 + 30k
so i'm guessing if 1.4 tsi, it's gonna be about the same as rocco lol

fyi for those who's gonna dyno, u'll most likely get error codes on ABS if u check in VCDS
as usually dyno is only moving your front wheels, rear wheels won't be moving hence ABS will detect there's no motion on your rears

RCD510 & RNS510 don't have bluetooth,
vw stock players don't come with bluetooth as they have a dedicated bluetooth module (9w7, 9wz)

which scirocco engine are talking about? 1.4 tsi, 2.0 tsi, 2.0 R or the 2.0 TDI?
http://www.topgear.com/uk/volkswagen/scirocco/verdict

While the 197bhp 2.0T engine might be broadly the same as the GTI's, the torque arrives earlier, making it seem quicker (though it hits 62mph in 7.2s, the same as the Golf). It's a bit inert when you really start to go mental, but you still come away with the sense that if you had to have a car that spans a multitude of situations, the Scirocco would be it.

Since the 1.4TSI comes with Volkswagen's 'Twincharger' system (meaning it boasts both a supercharger and turbocharger), it's lively and responsive despite it's diminutive size.

The 2.0TDI is fast-revving and punchy and sounds pretty rorty too. Not as clean and sweet as the petrol, but not rattly and never strained either.

The 260bhp 2.0 in the R feels punchier than the 197bhp You can feel the extra oomph, and yes, it is empirically really very quick indeed (0-62mph in 6s and 155mph) but most of the time, the noise and the power delivery is lacking that little extra something. And that something is joy.

This post has been edited by fr0sti3: Aug 5 2012, 11:16 AM

still too early to say

the drive train... it's same 1.8 turbo engine & 7 speed DSG as the Passat
you're paying 50k more just for the different body

might as well wait for it to come with 2.0 turbo & 6 speed DSG like the previous CC
better engine & gearbox, or get an old cc which is same drive train as golf gti

This post has been edited by fr0sti3: Aug 16 2012, 06:29 AM

yes the optimum range for DQ200 is 250nm from VWG published papers
compare to DQ250, there's a lower ceiling
so proceed with caution loh

fyi my polo 1.2 tsi using racechip pro, initially i was using it at max setting (7)
max setting is fun my stock figures are 105ps 175nm, i went dyno 109ps 202nm on wheel (ron95)
now i'm on 5 for the pass 2 weeks, better fuel mileage & smoother gear changing at low speeds

recon rocco 2.0 are using mk5 gti interiors and TFSI engines
not sure EA113 or EA888 though

it's quite a rare model, and not much demands for this either (handling wise it's not as good as cc, rocco & golf)
that could explain the price drop, as u might see mk5 gti pricing is still not dipping much

This post has been edited by fr0sti3: Aug 27 2012, 05:46 AM

can't see your pic
they other way to do it is to clean & clay/polish (if needed)that scratch & us touch up paint from VW

just saw your pics paint definitely is peel/rip of those spots, touch up paint from vw will do
but it won't be perfect smooth finish like fresh from oven

on the plus side i think that part of the car is not metal, so rust won't be an issue

As far as I know your paint code is LA9W/1K
U can verify by checking the sticker on your door or next to your spare tire there

http://www.paintscratch.com/touch_up_paint...at-LA9W-1K.html

Can try
http://ezytouchup.com/VOLKSWAGEN/q?cid=51&doit=showclass

depends on budget and purpose also lah
if kaki mod 2nd might be better hehe

looks like bigger polo...

ask SC for clutch plate replacement, dry dsg 7 has this issues

20k more than polo 1.2 tsi with same engine ~~~