Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Need some opinions on Diablo 3

views
     
rockroll5022
post Jul 17 2012, 12:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(faridfauzi @ Jul 15 2012, 12:15 PM)
Play with friends always the best - but not with friends that treat game world like real life.
For example, asked u to online, when u didnt on he/she wont talk to u for days
For a newbie - what class would u guys would suggest for me?
*
demon hunter all the way.. or probably wiz for the second choice but still demon hunter is mad fun.. although it is quite expensive to have a decent gear.. ^^


Added on July 17, 2012, 12:25 pm
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jul 17 2012, 12:18 PM)
Game of the year my ass.

It is the most overrated game this year because the game has not much to offer, other than playing the same content again and again on different characters and difficulties.
*
good graphic but it is very sad that blizzard has lost its way (making profit of game title that is not purely created by them).. as far as 'game of the year' goes, nah it should be 'overrated game of the year'..

This post has been edited by rockroll5022: Jul 17 2012, 12:25 PM
rockroll5022
post Jul 17 2012, 12:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jul 17 2012, 12:34 PM)
haha wut?
*
back in the days, Diablo 1 is created by Blizzard North then just before the release of the game, Blizzard BOUGHT Blizzard North.. after the critical successful of Diablo 1, Diablo 2 and Diablo 2 - Lord of Destruction is still developed by Blizzard North Team until there was a huge controversy within the company.. Blizzard North Team left the company for good and now they created another company known as Runic Games (the creator of Torchlight 1 and Torchlight 2) (this explained why the gameplay of Torchlight is quite similar with diablo games)..

In all, basically D3 is CREATED by greedy matafuker Blizzard employee NOT BLIZZARD NORTH TEAM.. it is a different team.. that is why the changes between classic Diablo (D1 and D2) with D3 is so huge significant..

As for the controversy, u can wikipedia Blizzard North for more details..

This post has been edited by rockroll5022: Jul 17 2012, 12:48 PM
rockroll5022
post Jul 17 2012, 12:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jul 17 2012, 12:51 PM)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_North

its called condor, and before blizzard "bought them over", diablo NEVER EXIST. please get your facts straight.

if no blizzard, no blizzard north, no diablo.
condor may have been a no-body, we will never knew.

also, saying it is not made by blizzard because another division (which is haha, called blizzard 'north') made it, is as retarded as saying battlefield series is not made by EA but by DICE because DICE is under EA. (in this case publisher/developer relation)
doh.gif
*
ohh i just realized that my bad.. however what i am trying to say is that the team behind the game development.. for blizzard there will be several teams example starcraft team, warcraft team and diablo team.. when the whole diablo team quitted, blizzard asked other team to continue make diablo games which changes the landscape of the game.. just like battlefield is under EA sport.. if whole battlefield team quitted, EA asked maybe FiFA team to make battlefield games.. it really changes the whole game.. know what i mean?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0163sec    0.68    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 01:31 PM