Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> BAM sponsoring 27council member to support Datuk, at London Olympic

views
     
SUSlauyah
post Jul 10 2012, 10:20 PM

ViSiToR
*****
Senior Member
811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Equine Park



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jul 10 2012, 09:39 PM)
I see nothing wrong.

LCW needs support.
*
yeah... so does the poor kid in some rural area. but yea, those kids can die, supporting LCW is more important! Nice logic u have.
BAM got the funding from the Sport ministry, meaning its coming from the tax payer.
SUSlauyah
post Jul 11 2012, 11:42 PM

ViSiToR
*****
Senior Member
811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Equine Park



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jul 10 2012, 10:23 PM)
There's already money allocated for rural purpose in the first place.

Your argument is as if saying government spending is 100% on one particular, single purpose, when in actual, like any government else in the world, budget is apportioned to certain amount for many different purposes.
*
what im saying is that money could have been use for better purpose. and those got sponsored, i could safely says that its their own people. if say they were sponsoring those that cant really afford to go, then its ok. charity better than cronies.

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0128sec    0.33    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 04:47 PM