QUOTE(peri peri @ Sep 4 2012, 10:50 AM)
i think u shouldn't worry too much, with the price u pay, u still get back the same premium material, products and lifestyles offered by SDB. I think u will need to sign on 2 S&P later. 1 is 100k purchase and 1 is 400k upgrade. Its like a compliance to medium cost unit by authority, but finding ways to get out from this not to jeopardizing the overall premium concept. Imagine, if the developer really comply to the said 30% quota, u will mix with low or medium income tenant.
Its a good practice nowaday because our minister is too lazy to improve such act which is totally irrelevant for limited lad use in KV.
BTW, larger built up normally cost lesser in term of psft. but i believe both blocks also sharing the same great features and material offers.
Yes, I agreed with the concept of larger seize with cheaper price. Anyhow, definitely not with this much difference!
I'm wondering if wanna sell after I got VP, how the bank valuers judgement?? Based on 400K upgrade price?
It is ridiculous when the subsales will be looking at which S&P??
I mean base at block A is definitely a good stay or investment.... But block C just look like a scam.... Medium cost building layout (door to door concept), highest density for this block, flat / apartment concept, no roof top, no own swimming pool but walk all the way to other block for facility.
The worst is we pay higher than anyone to stay in this project.... We r just paying for their facility...
No wonder hongleong pull out to finance this project.....