KLIA2 construction Updates, The ultimate Thread
|
|
 May 31 2012, 06:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009 
|
That's really big. hopefully it won't be underutilised, otherwise it's condition will be in a sorry state very soon (maintenance cost should be quite high)
This post has been edited by eugene90: May 31 2012, 06:41 PM |
|
|
May 31 2012, 06:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
When will KLIA2 commence it's service?
|
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 10:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
I am at KLIA main terminal (domestic terminal) right now - 10am and I notice that the occupancy is very low. I wonder why MAHB didnt want to offer AA to relocate some of their planes to KLIA (from LCCT).
|
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(amirsubhi @ Jun 1 2012, 10:25 AM) airasia dont want pay airport tax and jetbridge, I think that's the main reason. KLIA airport tax is different than LCCT  Do you mean that MAHB will not tax AA some more for using the new KLIA2 2yrs later? This post has been edited by eugene90: Jun 1 2012, 10:30 AM |
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 10:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
kay, it's boarding time! see you guys in 3 hours. tata.. flying back tawau
 who's up for yamcha? PM me...This post has been edited by eugene90: Jun 1 2012, 10:53 AM |
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 05:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(dude1218 @ Jun 1 2012, 12:44 PM) will mas back in line?? what line? |
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 05:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jun 1 2012, 05:42 PM) I think MAHB should consider extend KLIA Aerotrain to KLIA2. gosh, it's not in their original blueprint arh? That's really sux for those who is flying with AA and wish to continue their journey with mas and also pax who is traveling in the other way round ... |
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 09:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jun 1 2012, 05:48 PM) Haha, I remember what response I got during GLC open day. Did he mean that the ERL service between KLIA2 and KLIA will be free of charge?Me : Is there any plan for aerotrain extension to KLIA2? MAHB man : At this moment, not being planned Me : Oh, sounds inconvenient to me MAHB man : Got ERL extension ma... |
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 09:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jun 1 2012, 09:27 PM) No way. It sounds like there will be 2 separate airports which located next to each other. KLIA2 to KLIA will be RM 2. ops.. i think that's the whole project about - building a brand new airport - rather than expanding the existing capacity by a new "terminal". correct me if im wrong... So, after completion we will have 3 runways is it? |
|
|
Jun 1 2012, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jun 1 2012, 09:36 PM) Still a terminal rather than airport. Since they are a single entity, MAHB should have named the extension as terminal 1,2,3... and provide free transportation to interconnect one another. It still has the same "KUL" code. The KLIA2 project does include the third runway. Anyway, RM2 is considered affordable.... |
|
|
Jun 12 2012, 02:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
Waste of public fund
|
|
|
Jun 12 2012, 02:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
The group of engineer that studied the topographic before they constructed KLIA 15years ago discouraged the future engineers to build anything on certain plot of land nearby the airport because of the presence of unfavorable soil type. Today, the 3rd runways sits right on top of it. Cost overun could be attributed to this stubborn decision.... Source : YouTube >> lim guan eng >> klia2
This post has been edited by eugene90: Jun 12 2012, 02:36 PM |
|
|
Jun 14 2012, 08:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jun 12 2012, 05:34 PM) That was the plan until LCCT "appeared" This is very obvious... at least we should follow the architectural design of KLIA... doesn't seem to be integrating well into the current designThe old plan by the late Kisho Kurokawa had been modified. |
|
|
Jun 15 2012, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(jonn zee @ Jun 14 2012, 09:12 AM) +9. If the design is not well done. I think settlement is likely to happen in DEEP peat. KLIA2, i m involved in the prelim construction works.. the earthworks there simply ???? we hv to sheetpile the perimeter. cause it's all peat. a whole lot of mofo deep peat Bear in mind that the intended life cycle of KLIA is 100years. Hopefully, there will be no differential settlement in the next 100 years lor... otherwise, more $$ needed... This post has been edited by eugene90: Jun 15 2012, 01:30 AM |
|
|
Jun 15 2012, 09:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(RegentCid @ Jun 15 2012, 09:06 AM) Should move the AirAsia into KLIA...case closed...save few billlion riggit. MAS don't lik? they have no choice....Gov bail them they have no more any right This is what the rakyat have been questioning... Why can't AA move to KLIA? Who's blocking AA from moving into KLIA? Don't tell me that Malaysia Airlines (MAS) owns Malaysia Airport Holding Berhad (MAHB) and MAS can dictate MAHB's decision. |
|
|
Jun 19 2012, 12:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
Then why did they come out with another airport design, shouldn't MAHB follow the KLIA design for consistency and harmonious integration of design. Sometimes, i just cannot brain why malaysians do things in certain ways....
|
|
|
Jun 20 2012, 08:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(jonn zee @ Jun 19 2012, 01:06 PM) because KLIA design is not MAHB's and to reappoint the same consultant is a waste as the consultant in question may play2 in prefessional fees... I heard that there's no connectivity between klia and klia2... both cannot integrate into 1 piece...an os why's teh need for consistency.?? |
|
|
Jun 20 2012, 01:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Junior Member
251 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(jonn zee @ Jun 20 2012, 09:14 AM) wht u mean by connectivity? physical connetivity? nope. the buildings are hundred meter apart. transport wise connectivity? yup. u can board the ERL from KLIA to KLIA 2 and vice versa. flight connectivity? nope, youve got to go through the immigration (for internationals) get off the arrival halls and board the ERL, airport cab, busses or ur own transport to go to KLIA2 and hv urselves checked in and vice versa. QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jun 20 2012, 10:00 AM) I think there is one flaw in terms of connectivity between KLIA and KLIA2. kampung says wat i want to say...ERL is mainly for transport to KL, I don't it is convenient for a transiting passenger to transfer between terminal using ERL. MAHB should have extend KLIA Aerotrain for inter-terminal transport. Anybody knows the utility rate of Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport? AA can just be relocated to there actually... |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.2494sec
 0.11
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 10:28 AM |
Quote