Sep 2 2012, 03:47 PM
QUOTE(norther @ Jun 12 2012, 10:00 PM)
I am here to declares, first we got population. The world today has 7.019 billion people. That's headed up to about 11 billion. We should reduce the world population for reduce all the problems of mankind and nothing was done against over population till today.
Noah was advised to 'replenish' the earth - not fill it!
Human being is cancer to the environment, how do we cure cancer without killing a bit of ourselves? Amputation isn't an easy decision. Noah was advised to 'replenish' the earth - not fill it!
QUOTE(diversenature @ Jun 13 2012, 11:33 AM)
Don't need to be that extreme gua...
Governments should have policies to discourage large families.
Elite? Who are they?
China has been practising population control, they over spilled all over the world but it didn't work, only slowing it down.Governments should have policies to discourage large families.
Elite? Who are they?
The so called ELITE are the wise group who happen to worry about this issue long ago and they formed alliance that can influence with financial & military power, better known as the new world order conspiracy.
QUOTE(reinloch @ Jun 13 2012, 04:12 PM)
While we as individuals can't do much to stop or even slow down the decay of our planet, but we must do something nevertheless. What we can do, I guess, is contribute toward slowing down the consumption of resources. We can certainly do away with some of the things that we think we need, not out of necessity but out of luxury.
For example, when you go out to buy that new ipad or smartphone, you need to think about whether you need it or not, or whether your older devices can still soldier on.
If each of us just make one change to our daily routine for the sake of the planet, the nett effect could have some significance.
Such awareness campaign is counter productive to improvement, quality of life is about different kinds of luxury, not necessity, we are not zoo animal.For example, when you go out to buy that new ipad or smartphone, you need to think about whether you need it or not, or whether your older devices can still soldier on.
If each of us just make one change to our daily routine for the sake of the planet, the nett effect could have some significance.
QUOTE(diversenature @ Jun 16 2012, 02:26 AM)
It somehow irks me to read articles in newspaper about going green, saving the environment, recycling, doing this doing that etc etc but doesn't talk about the growing world population.... WHY?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/...90418075752.htm
Worst Environmental Problem?.....
“Overpopulation is the ONLY problem,” said Dr. Charles A. Hall, a systems ecologist.
The Newspaper can only promote what thought to be good not scared people with survival of the species, the least they want is controversy. The majority who over populate has to be contained by the minority who develop solution and technologies but deliver systematically, notice educated couples or wealthy parents have less children?http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/...90418075752.htm
Worst Environmental Problem?.....
“Overpopulation is the ONLY problem,” said Dr. Charles A. Hall, a systems ecologist.
I believe people who have the resources prepared for the worst humanity crisis, its a time bomb and when it go off, many will die, only then the new world order can begin.
Quote
0.0161sec
0.65
7 queries
GZIP Disabled