QUOTE(Donald Trump @ Jun 10 2012, 05:28 PM)
Ktm is a big No... why go to sentral? Change line again to go to other parts of kl... imagine u got the change 2 station to go to kl...this Brt is a crap must as well scrap it a waste of money idiot prasana
More corruption... small budget project big allcation ...and foa all u know Puchong got 3 stations!!
Space ..u can elevate it..building transport system is to carry the mess crowd not measure by which is the convenient way to build...again stupidy wins for the goverment prasana
Changing station is not hard at all. As long as the ticketing system covers different lines. In fact when I was in Shanghai and Singapore, many of the trips made on metro still requires transfer, but the difference is that in these cities, transfers are made much more convenient.
BRT concept is proven in Bangkok, Seoul and Cape Town.
The ticketing system of the BRT will be the same as LRT and future MRT.
When developing rail line, Prasarana considers factors such as:
- The ease of building the line
- The population catchment
- Travelling time
And so, they decided the LRT extension should be like this.
Kelana Jaya station ------> Lembah Subang ----> Kelana Jaya Centre Point -----> KTM Subang Jaya.
Had they consider to route the whole thing to Icon City, there is an issue that the alignment will be too far and has much higher percentage to receive objection (in court) as that alignment needed to go all the way Icon City will pass through heavily built residential area.
Other factors considered during alignment planning are curve radius (Kelana Jaya line can handle up to 100 m curve radius) and gradient up to 6% (limit of Kelana Jaya line).
If any blame, blame it on government and the authorities
This post has been edited by Kampung2005: Jun 10 2012, 05:46 PM