Photography Sony RX100, New standard for compact camera ?
Photography Sony RX100, New standard for compact camera ?
|
|
Feb 27 2016, 11:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
Just got my RX100 Mark III from J One, comes with extra battery and case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2016, 10:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(Pewufod @ Feb 28 2016, 02:37 AM) 2.3K, free battery, case and a Sony 16GB SDHC UHS-I card. QUOTE(67zai @ Feb 28 2016, 09:15 AM) Soft skin effect? ![]() DSC00149 by kingkingyyk, on Flickr This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Feb 28 2016, 10:05 AM |
|
|
Mar 3 2016, 11:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2016, 09:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(bearbear @ Mar 7 2016, 10:23 AM) RM2,156 Go for 8GB card. If you shoot raw, each raw is around 25MB. 7000MB / 25MB = 280 photos.8GB memory card + extra battery VS 16GB memory card, which is more worthy? Roughly how many pic in 8GB? one full charge can last taking 300 pictures? To make use of the full video potential, you need a SDXC card. |
|
|
Mar 8 2016, 05:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(facktura @ Mar 8 2016, 03:48 PM) May i know whats the difference between SDXC and SDHC card? SDHC supports up to maximum 32GB, while SDXC supports up 2TB.Im using Sandisk Extreme SDHC card on my MK3. Usually 64GB or larger cards are based on SDXC, while smaller are SDHC. I bought Extreme Pro 32GB earlier then only found out the high bitrate video isn't supported due to SDHC This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Mar 8 2016, 05:43 PM |
|
|
Mar 8 2016, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2016, 09:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2016, 12:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(janson_kaniaz @ Mar 11 2016, 10:11 AM) PhotoshopQUOTE(RedShirt @ Mar 11 2016, 11:53 AM) Perhaps I am asking a Captain Obvious question but since there are many users here, like to ask if the image quality difference is significant over phone camera (say Nexus 6P) especially for macro shots and/or low light conditions? If you are comparing to typical compact camera which deploys 1/2.33" sensor, the quality will be similar. For 1/1.7" or even 1" (RX100), phone still has no match to them. This is the physics limitation.![]() DSC00796 by kingkingyyk, on Flickr ISO-800 but the image is still extremely clean. Phone camera? Already a mess. The RX100 does beat entry level DSLR with kit lens thanks to the big aperture lens keeping the ISO low. This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Mar 11 2016, 12:32 PM |
|
|
Mar 11 2016, 01:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Apr 17 2016, 03:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
![]() DSC01500 by kingkingyyk, on Flickr ![]() DSC01502 by kingkingyyk, on Flickr Another one with f/8 This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Apr 17 2016, 03:19 PM |
|
|
May 2 2016, 11:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(pds_disi @ May 1 2016, 07:54 PM) If Sony going to continue make a new version every year, I wish they can make the angle of view wider; or as wide as some cellphone camera, while remain the quality of cause. The mark III and IV have 24mm wide, which is just tad narrower than Xperia Z series. Other phones have 26mm or 28mm. |
|
|
May 20 2016, 10:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
![]() DSC02016 by kingkingyyk, on Flickr Added ~3 stops of exposure and the shadow still show extremely little noise. At base ISO though. |
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 07:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 17 2016, 05:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(vincetee06 @ Jun 17 2016, 04:20 PM) Focus peaking? what is that? actually i want to create manual focus effect during video shotting. Focus peaking will highlight the in focus area in the viewfinder so you will know what object is in focus currently.I like to know can i done this on RX100 iv. Yes, you can. But you need to get use of it as the the zoom ring sensitivity is quite high, so you need to turn quite a lot to focus from infinity to macro. ----------------------------------------------------------- ![]() DSC02303 by kingkingyyk, on Flickr |
|
|
Jun 27 2016, 09:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 9 2016, 11:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(Fawkes @ Jul 9 2016, 08:49 AM) Hmm, is a6300 the new replacement to a6000? It is almost double the price of a6000. Will there be a cheaper upgrade coming soon? Not really due to the pricing and performance. No sign of a6000 replacement coming soon too. It is already a capable camera for most purposes.----------------------------------------------------- ![]() IMG_0010 by kingkingyyk, on Flickr Sexy RX100, shoot by 1100D + 50mm f/1.8 This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jul 9 2016, 11:54 AM |
|
|
Jul 9 2016, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2016, 01:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(daryl020189 @ Aug 28 2016, 06:34 PM) Oh ok...I thought intelligent auto show better..cause superior auto seem like a little blur when capture scene with movement..haha The camera is quite conservative in shutter speed. It defaults to ~1/(1.5x focal length), so in some daylight scene you will get up to ISO 1000 with telephoto length.As far as I tried, 1/10 is still able to get sharp pictures at that length, but the ISO is way lower (lower noise & better dynamic range!). I would use A mode for broad daylight (let the camera control the shutter speed as it is at base ISO anyway) and M mode for indoor & lowlight so I can control the shutter speed. This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Sep 11 2016, 01:24 PM |
|
|
Sep 16 2016, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 6 2016, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(neozeroash @ Oct 6 2016, 10:59 PM) Sony RX100 mark V already announce.. Delivers image quality as good as DSLR/Mirrorless Kit in a compact package, it is still a killer. Especially with the mad 24 FPS. Source 1 : Gizmodo Source 2 : Sony gg price 1000USD |
| Change to: | 0.0566sec
0.65
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 04:33 AM |