QUOTE(vinorgouki @ Jun 7 2012, 02:49 PM)
ok. just come back from the Proton SC. well, this is my 2nd time service for my Exora Bold. and i had a very very bad experience with it.
I arrive SC at 11.15am. go to counter to enquiry. i told them i got bring my own engine oil. so the billing statement come out like this.
1 - X1R Engine Treatment - RM48.00
1 - X1R (P) Treatment - RM28.00
1 - Gasket Plug Oil Drain - RM3.32
1 - Oil Filter Campro Engine - RM12.22
Did some search and it seems X1R contains high level of Extreme Pressure/Anti Wear additives ZDDP. If I wanted more ZDDP, I would simply use an API-SL rated oil instead of SM rated oil rather than getting it from X1R. SL rated oil has higher level of ZDDP than SM oil. In fact, this may be one reason why Proton/Lotus asked you to use Mineral Oil because the Mach 5 10w50 is SL rated.
By using the high ZDDP in X1R, you run the risk of killing your catalytic convertor much faster. The high sulfur in X1R will also kill your gearbox copper/bronze parts much faster also.
If I were you, I will insist the mechanic take the X1R out of the engine.
http://pub27.bravenet.com/faq/show.php?use...5418&catid=1397I have not heard much about x1r so i decieded to try a little experiment. i use oil analysis on my truck and know what my oil additives, wear metals, and other basic levels run on the average. in talking with race car drivers and engine builders, they all laid claim as to how good this stuff really works. well here is what i come to learn from this experience. i run schaeffers 15w40 in my truck, at about 200 miles before i was to change my oil, i put a bottle of x1r in as directed from them. now since schaeffers already has an excellent barrier lubricant in the oil, i never noticed any difference when i put the x1r in. after 200 miles of normal use, i drained and pulled the sample. when the lab results came back my concerns were a reality. with 6600 miles on my oil the results showed my ep/antiwear (zinc/ph) levels really high (zinc-1180/ph-1078 norm would be around 730-850). also the detergents (cal) was through the roof at over 3660ppms (norm 730-850ppm). now what that did is elevate my oxidation level that was norm at 19 to a 33. i also found sulfur levels that was never a problem (always at 0 out of 100%) now at 30%. my viscosity level was higher than normal, (15cst) where as it would be around 13.47-14. my thought on this is, i will personally never run x1r in anything i own again. i can see where in a race application, this is an excellent way to add some extra protection but, then the oil is changed after a few races and race engines are subject to rebuilds more often than personal car engines so the oxidation doesn't have time to do any damage to the soft metals. with higher levels of oxidation, your soft metals would begin to show possible damage by using this technology in a conventional engine. my personal observation of the x1r additive is it's an overload of ep's z/ph and a high level of cal detergent that causes a rise in visc due to higher levels of oxidation. this has been my thoughts that an overload of ep including mos2 would cause oxidation levels to rise causing the visc to increase as well. another thing i find interesting is the x1r is an additive that is used in gear boxes, rearends, manual transmissions, and powerstearing units. as most of you know, all those applications haven't got the blowby gases in them like an engine produces and in gearboxes and rearends as well as other things, they are usually using a higher level of ep.since this is touted to be a versital additive from engine to rearend, it is using nothing more than the same basic additives in oils by overloading them. this is nothing more than a personal experience/opion of what i feel about this product. this isn't to say it can't be good, but i believe that in the average vehicle situation, i'd tread lightly when it comes to this and most other ep additives. bob
Category: OIL ADDITIVES