I think everyone should calm down.

Every event will have its hiccups despite best intentions.

The rules were changed to prevent (as best they could) professionally / sponsored players from sneaking in and tilting the balance too much. The rules weren't changed to discriminate against any teams in particular and the rules were presented again before the tournament to be read and signed by all participating teams. The club has done its due diligence in ensuring that the teams aren't unbalanced.
The fact that the rules were being refined and were SMS-Ed to everyone the night before actually represents the clubs dedication to ensure their rules are solid.

Sign only if you feel that the terms are acceptable.
Same applies to all documents you will find in life. Read in, and sign only if you accept.

The idea of Amateur-only is to provide a fighting chance for all teams. The reason 'mini' isnt stated in the title is because it should be apparent in the prize-money offered.

As for tournament organizers not being experienced? Seriously?
It is being run by a university club to the best of their ability. Of course criticisms are welcome as we hope to improve upon the execution of future events. The club is learning as well. Managing the number of people involved is definitely not an easy task and I think the event has gone as smoothly as it could.

An event's success rate is usually evaluated based on the number of satisfied players vs. complaints.
That being said, we appreciate the feedback and no hard feelings. Those are definitely things to consider for future tournaments and we definately want to improve. We hope to continue having your support in future tournaments. Do let us know if there are further ways you feel we cold improve (without the emotions)

Some teams lose, some win. Dust off, get up and try again.

Thanks,
Ivan
KDUGC Representative