Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 D3 user agreement

views
     
TSTak3shi
post May 30 2012, 03:43 PM, updated 14y ago

Casual
***
Junior Member
431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
Did you guys see the new user agreement we were forced to accept? I just read some briefly.

- Blizzard owns the whole game, you're not entitled to any claims.
- Use of service is leased. Downtime and any other time the game is down is expected and u cannot expect sue or expect compensation for blizzard should the game go down for xxx amount of time.
- you're not entitled to refunds, period.
- u cant keep more than usd 100 in your account without an authenticator.
- blizzard is not responsible for you loss of items or money.
- All sharing or transfer of account is banned and strictly prohibited, etc.


Just some of the stuff i read till the wall of text killed me, isn't this heavily skewed in their favour. sad.gif
TSTak3shi
post May 30 2012, 07:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
its not installing, when u login 1st time after the maintenance today they updated a new user agreement.
TSTak3shi
post May 31 2012, 03:05 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
Sorry i think some of the replies are heavily retarded. You buy something, there is legal implications if what you buy isn't delivered or faulty. You don't go receiving a broken phone that u paid 1k usd for and receive a response take it or leave it for something that is broken.

The change of the UA was like going to the doctor and if he prescribes the wrong drug and kills you that's ok, no legal implications to a a lesser extent. I understand there's been a lot of d3 sucks so on and so forth but do some of you even think before replying? Service agreements and gameplay are totally different, if a service agreement is heavily skewed it means that support can and may be terrible or in the event things go very bad the companies involved wouldn't even need to lift a thumb to fix things.

There must be a reason for the updated UA, they wont go to extra lengths to update it unless there's something they are anticipating in terms of user response and like any intelligent consumers I thought there would be more who would bother to read through something before they accept it, even if isn't something we don't have much a choice in, there could be further discussions as to why certain things have been implemented and the implications of these actions instead of turning a blind eye and then complaining when shit hits the fan. Being a smart consumer is knowing what you're accepting and at least preparing for the options available beforehand.

This post has been edited by Tak3shi: May 31 2012, 03:11 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0162sec    0.32    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 07:23 AM