Close to RM 200k? the last time i checked it was RM 85 000++, and that was around a month ago.
Did the fees increase again?
Btw how is the LAM accreditation vist in taylors going so far?
Wouldn't failing the students earn the university more money? When a student fails, he/she has to pay the fees to resit/repeat the subject/semester.
For example,
When a student fails a subject, he/she has to resit/repeat the subject in order to advance and eventually graduate. To resit/repeat the subject, he/she has to pay the same amount of fees paid the last time for that particular subject. Eg: 1 sub= RM1 500- RM3 000.
So lets say he/she fails 3 subjects and has to resit the papers in the next semester= RM4 500-RM9 000. Wouldn't that mean that the university earns extra money from that student in that semester?
And even if the student failed, he/she still had to pay for the fees for the semester that he/she failed, no?
Hence, fail=resit/repeat=more money?
just wondering
Tan Sri is a big picture guy, so let’s look at the big picture. It's not about earning more money (well it’s important to earn more money), but Tan Sri wouldn’t care about the extra money he could earn from a student repeating a 3 credits course. It's all about his customer service philosophy (servicing the paymaster). His philosophy is parents wouldn’t like it when their child failed a subject, the parents would think that either their child didn't study hard enough or the teacher of LUCT didn't teach well enough. Anyway there is always a risk of being blame once a student failed. In order to eliminate the risk, it's best to pass all the students. So LUCT will remain the reputation of being a good school and able to produce students with "good" results. With this reputation he can earn MORE money to pay for his RR.
Jun 26 2011, 10:46 PM
Quote
0.0154sec
0.15
7 queries
GZIP Disabled